2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.tra.2012.07.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Relationship between service quality and demand for inter-urban buses

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
26
0
2

Year Published

2014
2014
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
1
26
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Whilst the affordability of the PT service has been previously highlighted as having a notable effect on modal choice, and hence ridership, it is clear from these studies that individuals appear not to consider the cost of a journey important when evaluating its quality, which concurs with the findings of Rojo et al (2012). This analysis has also highlighted that the public either consider the environmental friendliness of PT as an after-thought or label it as a low priority, with some studies even failing to include it in their questions regarding passenger requirements.…”
Section: Comparison Of Different Studiessupporting
confidence: 77%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Whilst the affordability of the PT service has been previously highlighted as having a notable effect on modal choice, and hence ridership, it is clear from these studies that individuals appear not to consider the cost of a journey important when evaluating its quality, which concurs with the findings of Rojo et al (2012). This analysis has also highlighted that the public either consider the environmental friendliness of PT as an after-thought or label it as a low priority, with some studies even failing to include it in their questions regarding passenger requirements.…”
Section: Comparison Of Different Studiessupporting
confidence: 77%
“…They further highlighted that travellers reluctant to use buses may use urban rail systems, since they offer a perceived higher quality of service. Furthermore, (Rojo et al, 2012) found that citizens are much more willing to pay a premium for a quick and frequent rail service than for other urban transport modes, including bus and private car travel. In a study of 811 Stockholm commuters, it was found that, with regard to comfort issues, the bus was preferred to the car, while the train was preferred to the bus, with those questioned stating they enjoyed the ability to rest, work and move around (Vredin Johansson et al, 2006).…”
Section: Modal Choicementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Personal transport choice has been investigated intensely with regard to the effects of demographic and socio-economic factors (Golob and Hensher 1998;Johansson-Stenman 2002), attitudes (Recker and Golob 1976;Vredin Johansson et al 2006), travel times and costs (Thobani 1984;Train 1980), and trip-related activities (Ben-Akiva and Bowman 1998;Bowman and Ben-Akiva 2001). Based on the empirical finding that the perceived quality of public transport is an important determinant of its use (Bresson et al 2003;Dargay and Hanly 2002;Rojo et al 2012), this study uses the impact of an individual's level of satisfaction with public transport on his or her mode choice as an example that allows us to investigate the value of cross-sectional and crosstemporal analyses of service quality. Hence, we survey the quality ratings for various service attributes (regarding service processes and results; see Harvey 1998).…”
Section: Data and Measuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Quality of service is the transit passengers' assessment of the standard of the service delivered (TRB 2013). Behavioral intention is transit passengers' judgment about the likelihood of continuing to use public transportation or willingness to recommend it to others (Rojo et al 2012). Quality of service could affect perceived value, satisfaction and involvement, which could finally influence behavioral intentions of transit passengers (Lai, Chen 2011).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%