1999
DOI: 10.1016/s0378-1127(98)00494-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Relationship between soils and Amazon forest biomass: a landscape-scale study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

30
284
2
27

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 384 publications
(343 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
30
284
2
27
Order By: Relevance
“…With regard to soil nutrients, at the basin scale, analyses indicate that forest composition, structure, biomass, and dynamics also vary across a gradient in soil fertility (16,17), with the younger, more fertile soils of western Amazonia supporting forests with lower AGB and higher rates of biomass productivity and stem turnover relative to the forests of the central Amazon and Guianan Shield, which are located on older, more nutrient-poor soils. Meanwhile, landscape-scale studies in central (29) and northwestern (30) Amazonia have found that more fertile clay soils have higher AGB than nutrient-poor sandy soils. Further discussion of the impact of soil nutrients can be found in SI Appendix, section S2).…”
Section: Significancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…With regard to soil nutrients, at the basin scale, analyses indicate that forest composition, structure, biomass, and dynamics also vary across a gradient in soil fertility (16,17), with the younger, more fertile soils of western Amazonia supporting forests with lower AGB and higher rates of biomass productivity and stem turnover relative to the forests of the central Amazon and Guianan Shield, which are located on older, more nutrient-poor soils. Meanwhile, landscape-scale studies in central (29) and northwestern (30) Amazonia have found that more fertile clay soils have higher AGB than nutrient-poor sandy soils. Further discussion of the impact of soil nutrients can be found in SI Appendix, section S2).…”
Section: Significancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…As they are spatially very heterogeneous, the variability within a single soil type is usually high and can equal the variability of the whole region (Rasmussen, 2006). Their characterization by a mean value and a defined uncertainty is much more difficult, and it requires a higher number of observations (Laurance et al, 1999;Galbraith et al, 2003;Amichev and Galbraith, 2004;Maia et al, 2009).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this case, the coefficient of variation (CV) was 13.2 %, with mean aboveground live biomass of 356 ± 47 Mg ha -1 for all trees, based on measurements for trees C10 cm DBH (diameter at breast height: diameter at 1.3 m above the ground or above any buttresses) with a 12 % correction for small trees (Laurance et al 1999). In 72 1-ha plots in the Ducke Reserve, also near Manaus, the CV was 12.8 %, with mean aboveground live biomass for trees C1 cm DBH, which allows as few as three 1-ha plots to provide an estimate with a mean value within 10 % of the true mean (considering a 95 % confidence interval), indicating the priority for surveys at widely spaced locations, each with only a small numbers of plots (Nascimento and Laurance 2002).…”
Section: Improving Ground-based Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%