1963
DOI: 10.1097/00007890-196301020-00002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Relationship Between Survival Time and Size of Homografts in Rats*

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
2
0
1

Year Published

1964
1964
1979
1979

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
2
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In contrast, in the burned patient the diminished immune response is the reason the graft can survive for a prolonged period. These findings of protracted survival of massive skin grafts in the rat are at variance with the findings of Matter, Chambler, Lewis, and Blocker (1963) in similar animals. They Claimed that prolonged survival could not be obtained with an increase in the size of the donor skin and it was suggested that graft acceptance is associated with histocompatibility rather than with quantity of tissue.…”
Section: Other Experimental Studiessupporting
confidence: 63%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In contrast, in the burned patient the diminished immune response is the reason the graft can survive for a prolonged period. These findings of protracted survival of massive skin grafts in the rat are at variance with the findings of Matter, Chambler, Lewis, and Blocker (1963) in similar animals. They Claimed that prolonged survival could not be obtained with an increase in the size of the donor skin and it was suggested that graft acceptance is associated with histocompatibility rather than with quantity of tissue.…”
Section: Other Experimental Studiessupporting
confidence: 63%
“…However, there are sharp differences of ooinion concerning the effect of graft size upon the immune system of the host in the rat (Matter et al 1963), dog (Veith et al 1966), and guinea pig (Guthy et al 1974). …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, some doubt has been thrown on this general view by the recent demonstration of more effective lymphatic function in the hamster cheek pouch (26). Other possible causes for prolonged allograft survival may be the small quantity of tissues implanted (27) and the repopulation of the vessels of these small grafts by host endothelium. With regard to the former, it was in the fetal grafts that rejection generally occurred in a short period, about 5 wk (Table I).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3) Εις τήν περίπτωσιν δευτερογενούς μεταμοσχεύσεως άλλου ιστού έκ του αύτου δότου επαναλαμβάνεται ταχύτερον ό μηχανισμός απορρί ψεως του μοσχεύματος, παρ' όσον είχε κινηθή προηγουμένως, είς τρόπον ώστε ή δευτερογενής άπόρριψις να επεκτείνεται είς όλους τους ιστούς οί όποιοι δέχονται αίμα δι' αιμοφόρων αγγείων. 4) Ή" δευτερογενής άπάντησις είναι ειδική δια τό ζώον, τό όποιον έχρησιμοποιήθη είς τήν αρχική ν μεταμόσχευσιν ή δια κάθε ίσογενές τοι ούτο και δέν έκδηλοΰται έναντι ιστών μή συγγενών γενετικώς και 5) Πολύ μικρά άλλομοσχεύματα δέρματος επιζούν κατά τι περισσότερον τών ευμεγεθών τοιούτων (Martinez et al 1961, Matter et al 1963.…”
Section: κεφαλαγον α'unclassified