Relationship Between the Calculated Physicochemical Parameters and Reversed Phase Thin-Layer Chromatographic Retention Behavior of Carboxamide Fungicides and Related Compounds

Abstract

& The lipophilicity of 6 carboxamide fungicides and 11 phenylbenzamide derivatives were determined by reversed phase layer chromatography (RP-TLC) employing silica and alumina as stationary phases impregnated with paraffin oil. Mixtures of methanol-water, acetonitrile-water, tetrahydrofurane-water, and acetone-water were used as mobile phases. The R M0 and b values related to the molecular lipophilicity and to the specific hydrophobic surface area (b) of the solutes were calculated separately for each RP-TLC system and for each analyte. The correlations between the physicochemical parameters measured were calculated by linear regression analysis. The impact of the site and character of the substituent on the retention of analytes was assessed by Free-Wilson analysis.The measured lipophilicity parameters were compared with 24 molecular descriptors computed applying free engines of the web. Calculations proved that the character of the stationary phase and the type of organic modifier exerted a negligible effect on the measured lipophilicity parameters. In the majority of cases the R M0 and b values and computed molecular descriptors were intercorrelated, but the fitness of the points to the linear regression equation was not strong enough to replace the measured values with the computed ones. This finding indicates the importance of using not only computed but also measured parameters for the future studies of both quantitative structure retention relationship (QSRR) and quantitative structure activity relationship (QSAR) calculations.

Examination of lipophilicity and toxicity of azo dyes derivatives

“…Za kvantitativno izražavanje lipofilnosti se najčešće primenjuje podeoni koeficijent, log P, koji predstavlja raspodelu molekula između 1-oktanola i vode [21,22]. Takođe, u QSRR (Quantitative structure-retention relationship) modelima se kao alternativno merilo lipofilnosti, primenjuju hromatografski retencioni parametri, R M 0 i m [23][24][25][26][27][28].U ovom radu je proučavano hromatografsko ponašanje i lipofilnost odabranih derivata azo boja, primenom tankoslojne hromatografije na obrnutim …”

Revisiting thin-layer chromatography as a lipophilicity determination tool. Part IV — A closer look on extrapolation and averaging

“…To mention only several examples, in reversed phase, methanol is used mainly as a modifier [3][4][5][6][7]; however, there are also studies done with acetone [8][9][10], acetonitrile and tetrahydrofurane [11][12][13] or dioxane [14]. Several new papers report use of micellar TLC [15][16] or even reversed phase thin-layer chromatography (RP-TLC) done on silica plates impregnated with oils or fats [17][18][19][20]. So TLC is still seen as an interesting alternative, having its advantages and disadvantages.…”