1961
DOI: 10.1161/01.cir.23.1.69
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Relationship between the Electrocardiogram and the Position of the Heart as Determined by Biplane Angiocardiography

Abstract: Anatomic orientation of the heart was determined in 53 patients by selective, biplane angiocardiography, and was compared with the mean electric axis and the location of the transition zone from conventional electrocardiograms. No significant correlation could be demonstrated between (a) the anatomic axis and the electric axis in the frontal plane, or (b) between the electric axis and rotation of the heart about its longitudinal axis, or (c) the location of the interventricular septum and the transition zone o… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

1963
1963
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Grant (1958) in comparing electrical axes with anatomical axes of the heart found that the anatomical position of the heart may account for relatively minor variations in the direction of the mean QRS vector (up to 300) but that it is rarely the cause of the greater axis deviations often seen. Guntheroth, Ovenfors, and Ikkos (1961), however, found no significant correlation between the electrical and anatomical axes in the frontal plane. Beheyt et al (1959) compared axes with height and found no significant correlation.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 67%
“…Grant (1958) in comparing electrical axes with anatomical axes of the heart found that the anatomical position of the heart may account for relatively minor variations in the direction of the mean QRS vector (up to 300) but that it is rarely the cause of the greater axis deviations often seen. Guntheroth, Ovenfors, and Ikkos (1961), however, found no significant correlation between the electrical and anatomical axes in the frontal plane. Beheyt et al (1959) compared axes with height and found no significant correlation.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 67%
“…However, attempts to assess rotation in coronal and sagittal planes by correlation of the anatomical axis of the heart, obtained from anterior and lateral radiographs of the chest, with the electrical axis (Hyman, Failey, and Ashman, 1948;Fowler and Braunstein, 1951), are clearly subject to considerable error, since there is no way of locating the interventricular septum. Grant (1953), in a series of careful anatomical studies, found little correlation between the electrical (mean QRS) and anatomical axes, and Guntheroth, Ovenfors, and Ikkos (1961) reached similar conclusions as a result of biplane angiocardiographic studies in children.…”
mentioning
confidence: 67%
“…The type II vectorcardiogram might also be explained by anatomical rotation of the heart about a longitudinal axis. The very limited evidence suggests that anatomical rotation of the heart in generalized lung disease or heart disease is insignificant and unrelated to changes in the electrical axis (Grant, 1953;Guntheroth, Ovenfors, and Ikkos, 1961). The type II vectorcardiogram could be related to hyperinflation of the lungs, a mechanism used by Caird and Wilcken (1962) to explain the change in the P axis in the frontal plane, but in the 11 patients who had a type II vectorcardiogram, the P axis exceeded 800 in only 2.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%