2014
DOI: 10.1111/cid.12261
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Relationship between the CT Value and Cortical Bone Thickness at Implant Recipient Sites and Primary Implant Stability with Comparison of Different Implant Types

Abstract: Obtained results suggest that the primary stability of implants could be quantitatively estimated using the CT value preoperatively, indicating the CT value of bone surrounding an implant can contribute considerably to implant planning and design choice in clinical situations.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
1
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
11
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, primary stability is one of the prerequisites for immediate loading. The design of the implant, quantity and density of the bone, and placement and surgical technique influence primary stability [ 2 3 4 5 6 7 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, primary stability is one of the prerequisites for immediate loading. The design of the implant, quantity and density of the bone, and placement and surgical technique influence primary stability [ 2 3 4 5 6 7 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Once the hard and soft tissues of the oral cavity have been digitally recorded, e.g., by intraoral scanners and modern 3D radiograph technology, these data can serve as the basis for further digital process steps [ 1 ]. Before implant surgery, the final position of the implants can be determined virtually using planning software and 3D radiograph images.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The microstructure associated with porous features, such as vascular channels, may have contributed influences to the stress concentrations and stress shielding around implants, yet the importance of these channels in the mechanical behaviour of cortical bone is not well understood. The design and integration of an implant and understanding of the bone‐prosthesis interface are important factors in prosthetic design, but the interaction between prosthesis and cortical bone at a fundamental microstructural level is relatively poorly understood . It is proposed that if one can characterize how the heterogeneity in the microstructure affects the macroscale stress, particularly periprosthetically, this may herald a greater potential for innovative, longer lasting prostheses designs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%