2017
DOI: 10.1007/s00405-017-4473-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Relationship between the time to locoregional recurrence and survival in laryngeal squamous-cell carcinoma

Abstract: To assess the relationship between the locoregional disease-free interval after treatment of the primary tumor and survival after a recurrence in patients with laryngeal carcinoma. We retrospectively investigated patients treated in our Cancer Center for a laryngeal cancer who subsequently developed a locoregional recurrence and were followed up until death. Post-recurrence survival was defined as the time from the locoregional recurrence to death. One hundred and twenty-three patients were included. Median po… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

2
5
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
2
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The data extracted here (Appendix S1) confirmed the oncologic efficacy of primary TL reported in smaller series at shorter follow‐up 20–23 . Thus, the 10‐year local control estimate was 89.7% (Fig.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 80%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The data extracted here (Appendix S1) confirmed the oncologic efficacy of primary TL reported in smaller series at shorter follow‐up 20–23 . Thus, the 10‐year local control estimate was 89.7% (Fig.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 80%
“…The data extracted here (Appendix S1) confirmed the oncologic efficacy of primary TL reported in smaller series at shorter follow-up. [20][21][22][23] Thus, the 10-year local control estimate was 89.7% (Fig. 3), while global local control after salvage of local recurrence was 92% and TL-related mortality was 3%, much lower than the 37%, 33%, and 28% 10-year mortality rates implicating index SCC progression, intercurrent disease and metachronous second primaries, respectively, after TL.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Survival is associated with the occurrence of recurrences, with the worst prognosis in the case of locoregional failure within the first year after treatment [ 6 ]. Data on recurrence rates for the different treatment strategies are controversial [ 7 10 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[10][11][12] In 2009, the larynx preservation clinical trial design consensus panel recommended a new endpoint: laryngo-esophageal dysfunction-free survival (LEDFS) to be the primary endpoint for future laryngeal preservation trials. 13 Events for this composite endpoint were; death, local failure (LF), total or partial laryngectomy, tracheotomy, or feeding tube dependency, however, regional failure (RF) and distant metastases (DM) were not included as events, despite that RF and DM are determinant in prognosis for laryngeal cancer patients, [14][15][16][17] and representing important events in laryngeal cancer outcomes trajectory. Therefore, we propose to have a new composite endpoint which encompass the survival (i.e., death), tumor relapse (i.e., LF, RF, and DM), and laryngo-esophageal dysfunction (i.e., speech and swallowing).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%