2003
DOI: 10.1016/s1359-6462(03)00021-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Relationship between time to reach Monkman–Grant ductility and rupture life

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
27
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
2

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 62 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The straight line of the ex-service material is situated below the straight line of the virgin material, with a trend for coincidence at low rupture times, but diverging progressively downwards for higher rupture times. This is a reflection of the higher value of m of the ex-service material (1.1872) in relation to the virgin material (1.0356), which implies loss of creep ductility of the material when exposed to service conditions [7]. Figure 8d shows the same kind of comparison in relation to the parameterized Monkman-Grant data of both materials.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 61%
“…The straight line of the ex-service material is situated below the straight line of the virgin material, with a trend for coincidence at low rupture times, but diverging progressively downwards for higher rupture times. This is a reflection of the higher value of m of the ex-service material (1.1872) in relation to the virgin material (1.0356), which implies loss of creep ductility of the material when exposed to service conditions [7]. Figure 8d shows the same kind of comparison in relation to the parameterized Monkman-Grant data of both materials.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 61%
“…1) as the time at which the useful secondary creep strain is exhausted along the creep curve. Further, t MGD is the time at which true tertiary creep sets in and the creep damage attains a critical level [8,9]. Beyond t MGD , accelerated growth of damage leads to failure.…”
Section: Relationship Between Time To Reach Monkman-grant Ductility Amentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In other words, t MGD conceptually divides the creep curve into safe-unsafe regions. Based on this concept and using the continuum creep damage mechanics (CDM) approach [14][15][16][17][18], a creep damage criterion [8,9] applicable for creeping solids has been recently proposed in the form of a relation between t MGD and t r that depends only on the creep damage tolerance factor λ. It is important to mention that λ is a significant parameter that assesses the susceptibility of a material to localised cracking at strain concentrations [18].…”
Section: Relationship Between Time To Reach Monkman-grant Ductility Amentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Detailed analysis of strain-time creep data in terms of unified approach and first order kinetics resulted in obtaining master creep curves (one interrelating transient creep and secondary creep and another interrelating tertiary creep and secondary creep) and new creep rate-time relationships of Monkman-Grant type [11,12]. Recently, a creep damage criterion has been introduced based on the seminal concept of time to reach Monkman-Grant ductility (the product of creep rate and rupture time) as the time where the secondary creep ductility is exhausted along the creep curve, the true tertiary creep sets in and damage attains a critical level [13]. The critical creep damage criterion was obtained using Continuum Damage Mechanics (CDM) approach, Material's Properties Council (MPC)-Omega approach and θ-Projection method, interrelating the time to reach Monkman-Grant ductility with rupture life that depends only on damage tolerance factor [14][15][16].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%