2004
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2004.03231.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Relationship between two anxiety instruments in patients receiving mechanical ventilatory support

Abstract: The VAS-A was found to be less burdensome for research participants than the Spielberger SAI, resulting in no missing data on the VAS-A. Findings from this study provide initial validation of the VAS-A as a justifiable instrument to measure anxiety in patients receiving mechanical ventilatory support. Researchers are advised to balance reliability and validity properties with response burden when selecting an instrument to measure anxiety in patients with communication challenges and energy limitations.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
82
1
7

Year Published

2009
2009
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 71 publications
(93 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
3
82
1
7
Order By: Relevance
“…for the POMS). Moreover, systematically comparing the psychometric properties of each measure seems rather difficult, since they have to be retrieved from various and sometimes scattered sources, such as the manuals and a set of psychometric papers addressing different combinations of instruments, with sometimes a lack of consistency across analysis techniques, sample types and research domains (e.g., Chlan, 2004;Stern et al, 1997; Millar et al, 1995). Ideally, psychometric assessments of the four instruments in the same samples, with systematic variations of the contexts, would need to be carried out in such a way to obtain comparative information at the psychometric level.…”
Section: State Anxiety: Construct and Measuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…for the POMS). Moreover, systematically comparing the psychometric properties of each measure seems rather difficult, since they have to be retrieved from various and sometimes scattered sources, such as the manuals and a set of psychometric papers addressing different combinations of instruments, with sometimes a lack of consistency across analysis techniques, sample types and research domains (e.g., Chlan, 2004;Stern et al, 1997; Millar et al, 1995). Ideally, psychometric assessments of the four instruments in the same samples, with systematic variations of the contexts, would need to be carried out in such a way to obtain comparative information at the psychometric level.…”
Section: State Anxiety: Construct and Measuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A total of 18 articles met the inclusion criteria and were included in the review. Of the 18 articles, 7 were studies on the validation of instruments [29][30][31][32][33][34][35] and 11 were studies that used relatively reliable and valid instruments. 25,[36][37][38][39][40][41][42][43][44][45] Care Setting and Patients' Characteristics Table 1 summarizes the sociodemographic and clinical characteristics of the samples.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…25,31 Choosing an instrument to measure anxiety requires great care to find a balance between the instrument's psychometric properties and the possibility of using it with ICU patients, who may have difficulty with more complex instruments because of physical and/or cognitive difficulties. In most of the studies 25,29,30,[32][33][34]38,40,43 reviewed that included information on the way the questionnaires were completed, patients (including cardiac patients) were helped by an interviewer. Participants completed the questionnaires themselves in just 1 study, 35 and these patients were about to be discharged.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations