2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2019.09.017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Relationship between urinalysis findings and responsible pathogens in children with urinary tract infections

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

5
8
0
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
5
8
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In another study conducted in Kosovo, the second most commonly isolated pathological agent was the Proteus species [ 10 ]. In two other studies from Turkey, Klebsiella species growths were reported as the second most common, similar to our finding [ 11 , 12 ]. Kidwai et al reported S. aureus and Klebsiella species as the second most common growths after E. coli in patients in low socioeconomic strata [ 13 ].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…In another study conducted in Kosovo, the second most commonly isolated pathological agent was the Proteus species [ 10 ]. In two other studies from Turkey, Klebsiella species growths were reported as the second most common, similar to our finding [ 11 , 12 ]. Kidwai et al reported S. aureus and Klebsiella species as the second most common growths after E. coli in patients in low socioeconomic strata [ 13 ].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Moreover, the microorganisms reproduced in the culture of patients with UTI may also be related to sex. Similar to our results, previous studies reported that the proportion of females was higher among patients with E. coli growths, and the male-to-female ratio was close to 1 among patients with Klebsiella species growths [12].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…A number of predictive models have been constructed to aid the diagnosis and management of UTIs in children, with varying success. Individual biomarkers have been proposed for guiding diagnosis (6,7), treatment and prognostication, while others propose combining routinely collected information to provide quantitative risk-based assessments (8,9). The lack of explanability and user engagement may be the reason many predictive models, regardless of their accuracy, fail to be successfully implemented or utilised (10)(11)(12)(13).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%