Abstract. Operation of a Meteor Radar (MWR) at EuThe three-year monthly means for both diurnal (DT) and semi-diurnal (SDT) winds demonstrate significantly different amplitudes and phases at Eureka and Svalbard. Typically the summer-maximizing DT is much larger (∼24 m s −1 at 97 km) at Eureka, while the Svalbard tide (5-24 m s −1 at 97 km)) is almost linear (north-south) rather than circular. Interannual variations are smallest in the summer and autumn months. The High Arctic SDT has maxima centred on August/September, followed in size by the winter features; and is much larger at Svalbard (24 m s −1 at 97 km, versus 14-18 m s −1 in central Canada). Depending on the location, the IAV are largest in spring/winter (Eureka) and summer/autumn (Svalbard).Fitting of wave-numbers for the migrating and nonmigrating tides (MT, NMT) determines dominant tides for each month and height. Existence of NMT is consisCorrespondence to: A. H. Manson (alan.manson@usask.ca) tent with nonlinear interactions between migrating tides and (quasi) stationary planetary wave (SPW) S = 1 (SPW1). For the diurnal oscillation, NMT s = 0 for the east-west (EW) wind component dominates (largest tide) in the late autumn and winter (November-February); and s = +2 is frequently seen in the north-south (NS) wind component for the same months. The semi-diurnal oscillation's NMT s = +1 dominates from March to June/July. There are patches of s = +3 and +1, in the late fall-winter. These wave numbers are also consistent with SPW1-MT interactions.Comparisons for 2007 of the observed DT and SDT at 78-80 • N, with those within the Canadian Middle Atmosphere Model Data Assimilation System CMAM-DAS, are a major feature of this paper. The diurnal tides for the two locations have important similarities as observed and modeled, with seasonal maxima in the mesosphere from April to October, and similar phases with long/evanescent wavelengths. However, differences are also significant: observed Eureka amplitudes are generally larger than the model; and at Svalbard the modeled tide is classically circular, rather than anomalous. For the semi-diurnal tide, the amplitudes and phases differ markedly between Eureka and Svalbard for both MWR-radar data and CMAM-DAS data. The seasonal variations from observed and modeled archives also differ at each location. Tidal NMT-amplitudes and wave-numbers for the model differ substantially from observations.