Search citation statements
Paper Sections
Citation Types
Year Published
Publication Types
Relationship
Authors
Journals
Objectives: The Response Evaluation in Neurofibromatosis and Schwannomatosis (REiNS) International Collaboration Whole-Body MRI (WB-MRI) Working Group reviewed the existing literature on WB-MRI, an emerging technology for assessing disease in patients with neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1), neurofibromatosis type 2 (NF2), and schwannomatosis (SWN), to recommend optimal image acquisition and analysis methods to enable WB-MRI as an endpoint in NF clinical trials.Methods: A systematic process was used to review all published data about WB-MRI in NF syndromes to assess diagnostic accuracy, feasibility and reproducibility, and data about specific techniques for assessment of tumor burden, characterization of neoplasms, and response to therapy.Results: WB-MRI at 1.5T or 3.0T is feasible for image acquisition. Short tau inversion recovery (STIR) sequence is used in all investigations to date, suggesting consensus about the utility of this sequence for detection of WB tumor burden in people with NF. There are insufficient data to support a consensus statement about the optimal imaging planes (axial vs coronal) or 2D vs 3D approaches. Functional imaging, although used in some NF studies, has not been systematically applied or evaluated. There are no comparative studies between regional vs WB-MRI or evaluations of WB-MRI reproducibility.Conclusions: WB-MRI is feasible for identifying tumors using both 1.5T and 3.0T systems. The STIR sequence is a core sequence. Additional investigation is needed to define the optimal approach for volumetric analysis, the reproducibility of WB-MRI in NF, and the diagnostic performance of WB-MRI vs regional MRI. Neurology ® 2016;87 (Suppl 1):S31-S39 GLOSSARY ADC 5 apparent diffusion coefficient; DWI 5 diffusion-weighted imaging; FDG 5 fluorodeoxyglucose; MPR 5 multiplanar reformation; NF1 5 neurofibromatosis type 1; NF2 5 neurofibromatosis type 2; PNST 5 peripheral nerve sheath tumors; REiNS 5 Response Evaluation in Neurofibromatosis and Schwannomatosis; SNR 5 signal to noise ratio; STIR 5 short tau inversion recovery; SWN 5 schwannomatosis; WB-MRI 5 whole-body MRI.Whole-body MRI (WB-MRI) allows imaging of a large volume of the body in a single image acquisition session. It has been extensively investigated for the detection and staging of visceral and osseous tumors [1][2][3][4][5][6] and is well-suited to tumor syndromes including neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1), neurofibromatosis type 2 (NF2), and schwannomatosis (SWN), 7-9 as these patients often have a high burden of tumors as well as large tumors that cross anatomic planes (figure). WB-MRI has been used to evaluate tumor burden and to characterize neoplasms in patients with NF syndromes [10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23] and is being used in some clinical trials to evaluate response to therapy (NCT01207687). A uniform image acquisition protocol and interpretation method would enable WB-MRI to be used as a key endpoint to assess tumor treatment response in multicenter clinical trials for NF-associated perip...
Objectives: The Response Evaluation in Neurofibromatosis and Schwannomatosis (REiNS) International Collaboration Whole-Body MRI (WB-MRI) Working Group reviewed the existing literature on WB-MRI, an emerging technology for assessing disease in patients with neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1), neurofibromatosis type 2 (NF2), and schwannomatosis (SWN), to recommend optimal image acquisition and analysis methods to enable WB-MRI as an endpoint in NF clinical trials.Methods: A systematic process was used to review all published data about WB-MRI in NF syndromes to assess diagnostic accuracy, feasibility and reproducibility, and data about specific techniques for assessment of tumor burden, characterization of neoplasms, and response to therapy.Results: WB-MRI at 1.5T or 3.0T is feasible for image acquisition. Short tau inversion recovery (STIR) sequence is used in all investigations to date, suggesting consensus about the utility of this sequence for detection of WB tumor burden in people with NF. There are insufficient data to support a consensus statement about the optimal imaging planes (axial vs coronal) or 2D vs 3D approaches. Functional imaging, although used in some NF studies, has not been systematically applied or evaluated. There are no comparative studies between regional vs WB-MRI or evaluations of WB-MRI reproducibility.Conclusions: WB-MRI is feasible for identifying tumors using both 1.5T and 3.0T systems. The STIR sequence is a core sequence. Additional investigation is needed to define the optimal approach for volumetric analysis, the reproducibility of WB-MRI in NF, and the diagnostic performance of WB-MRI vs regional MRI. Neurology ® 2016;87 (Suppl 1):S31-S39 GLOSSARY ADC 5 apparent diffusion coefficient; DWI 5 diffusion-weighted imaging; FDG 5 fluorodeoxyglucose; MPR 5 multiplanar reformation; NF1 5 neurofibromatosis type 1; NF2 5 neurofibromatosis type 2; PNST 5 peripheral nerve sheath tumors; REiNS 5 Response Evaluation in Neurofibromatosis and Schwannomatosis; SNR 5 signal to noise ratio; STIR 5 short tau inversion recovery; SWN 5 schwannomatosis; WB-MRI 5 whole-body MRI.Whole-body MRI (WB-MRI) allows imaging of a large volume of the body in a single image acquisition session. It has been extensively investigated for the detection and staging of visceral and osseous tumors [1][2][3][4][5][6] and is well-suited to tumor syndromes including neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1), neurofibromatosis type 2 (NF2), and schwannomatosis (SWN), 7-9 as these patients often have a high burden of tumors as well as large tumors that cross anatomic planes (figure). WB-MRI has been used to evaluate tumor burden and to characterize neoplasms in patients with NF syndromes [10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23] and is being used in some clinical trials to evaluate response to therapy (NCT01207687). A uniform image acquisition protocol and interpretation method would enable WB-MRI to be used as a key endpoint to assess tumor treatment response in multicenter clinical trials for NF-associated perip...
Schwannomas are benign neoplasms that can cause gain-and loss-of-function neurological phenotypes, including severe, intractable pain. To investigate the molecular mechanisms underlying schwannoma-associated pain we compared the RNA sequencing profile of painful and non-painful schwannomas from NF2 patients. Distinct segregation of painful and non-painful tumors by gene expression patterns was observed. Differential expression analysis showed the upregulation of fibroblast growth factor 7 (FGF7) in painful schwannomas. Behavioral support for this finding was observed using a xenograft human NF2-schwannoma model in nude mice. In this model, over-expression of FGF7 in intra-sciatically implanted NF2 tumor cells generated pain behavior compared with controls.
Neurofibromatosis Type 1 (NF1) plexiform neurofibromas (pNFs) are associated with a variety of symptoms and concerns that affect patients' quality of life (QOL), highlighting the value of incorporating the patients' perspective when evaluating treatment outcomes. To better conceptualize the experience of patients with pNFs, this qualitative study sought to identify the most important outcomes to assess from the perspective of patients, families, and clinicians. Clinicians, patients age 5 years old and above, and parents of patients aged 5-17 years participated in semi-structured interviews to elicit the pNF symptoms/concerns considered most important to assess. The data were analyzed using an iterative coding procedure and the frequency with which symptoms/concerns emerged was tabulated. Eight clinicians, 31 patients, and 17 parents of patients participated in semi-structured interviews. The most frequently reported concerns raised by patients across all age groups included pain, appearance/disfigurement, social activity/role participation, stigma, and anxiety. For parents, physical functioning was the primary concern, followed by pain, social activity/role participation, appearance/disfigurement, and social relationships. The resulting conceptual framework included five domains to represent the most important identified symptoms/concerns: pain, social functioning, physical function impact, stigma, and emotional distress. This conceptual framework describing the symptoms/concerns of patients with pNF can help investigators create a measurement system to improve assessment of aspects of QOL only patients can report on. It may also provide the ability to identify symptoms/concerns that might warrant referrals to various clinical disciplines. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.