Relationship education and marital satisfaction in newlywed couples: A propensity score analysis.

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to investigate whether premarital relationship education and characteristics of relationship education in a community sample of newlywed couples predicted marital trajectories over 27 months. Newlywed couples (N = 191) completed measures of marital satisfaction 9 times over 27 months, and prior to marriage they provided information about relationship education and demographic, personal, and relationship risk factors for marital distress. Propensity scores (i.e., the probability of receiving relationship education) were estimated using the marital distress risk factors, and used to derive a matched sample of 72 couples who participated in relationship education and 86 couples who did not. Multilevel analyses of the propensity score matched sample (n = 158) indicated that wives who participated in relationship education had declines in marital satisfaction while wives who did not receive relationship education maintained satisfaction over time. Furthermore, the more hours of relationship education the couple participated in, the less steeply their marital satisfaction declined. Findings indicate that participation in community-based relationship education may not prevent declines in marital satisfaction for newlywed couples. A possible explanation is that the quality of relationship education available to couples is generally poor and could be greatly improved by inclusion of empirically based relationship information and skills training that are known to lead to stronger marriages.

Group‐Based Trajectory Modeling of Marital Quality: A Critical Review

“…Doing so might also be beneficial for couple and relationship education (CRE) and evaluation. Satisfaction, for instance, has been widely used as an indicator of successful programing (Cobb & Sullivan, 2015), but the development of satisfaction might look distinct from the development of communication skills (Wadsworth & Markman, 2012) or conflict as an outcome over time.…”

An Implementation Study of Relationship Checkups as Home Visitations for Low‐Income At‐Risk Couples

“…Proc., Vol. For example, perhaps counterintuitively, Cobb and Sullivan (2015) discovered that marital satisfaction in women who participated in relationship education decreased compared to women who did not participate. / 249 less likely to divorce after receiving the intervention (Stanley et al, 2014).…”

“…Finally, gender might also moderate relationship education effectiveness. For example, perhaps counterintuitively, Cobb and Sullivan (2015) discovered that marital satisfaction in women who participated in relationship education decreased compared to women who did not participate. In sum, given the mounting evidence that one size does not fit all for relationship education, Halford & Bodenmann (2013) argue that analyzing moderators of relationship education outcomes and identifying "what works for whom" can help tailor relationship education and intervention to individual couples' needs.…”

Effect of Premarital Counseling on Marital Satisfaction

“…Marital satisfaction could be considered as a psychological situation that does not develop on its own, rather it needs efforts of both partners, particularly in the first few years of marriage, when the marriage is most instable and relationships are at greatest risks. Marital satisfaction is one of the most important and influential factors in the continuation of a successful, healthy, and happy life (10). Experts have census on identifying influential factors on marital satisfaction and believe that successful marriage requires special abilities and skills that couples should have including communication and problem solving skills.…”