1992
DOI: 10.1002/j.1467-8438.1992.tb00896.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Relationship, Language and Pre‐Understanding in the Reflecting Processes

Abstract: This article discusses whether the concepts ‘relationship’, ‘expressing oneself’ and ‘pre‐understanding’ might be better starting points to describe and understand ‘the therapeutic process’ than the traditional concepts ‘theory’ and ‘method’. The discussion has emerged from participation in, and will itself clarify, theso‐called “reflecting processes”.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
31
0
1

Year Published

1994
1994
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
31
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition to the visible and audible aspects of therapeutic conversations, we know that family and network therapy feature covert dimensions that have an important role in the therapeutic process (Anderson and Goolishian 1992;Andersen 1991;Rober 2002). In our study, we investigate the experiences, feelings, and thoughts of individuals in terms of inner dialogues that are not necessarily shared in the actual conversation and their contribution to the emergence of significant and meaningful moments.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…In addition to the visible and audible aspects of therapeutic conversations, we know that family and network therapy feature covert dimensions that have an important role in the therapeutic process (Anderson and Goolishian 1992;Andersen 1991;Rober 2002). In our study, we investigate the experiences, feelings, and thoughts of individuals in terms of inner dialogues that are not necessarily shared in the actual conversation and their contribution to the emergence of significant and meaningful moments.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…From all the information communicated only a small part is possible to take into account and the information that can stay conscious and kept in shortterm memory is limited (Christiansson 1994). An open and empathic attitude coupled with a readiness to acknowledge one's own pre-understanding and reactions can make it easier to receive what the others are communicating (Andersen 1992). There is a risk that the first meeting can be filled with insensitivity and misunderstanding (Andersson et al 1990;Salamon 1993) and the choice of therapeutic method seems to be of less importance than establishing a dialogue with clients and seeing the polyphonic nature of their reality (Seikkula et al 2003).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Studies have appeared on intimacy (James and Kirkland, 1993;Weingarten, 1991Weingarten, , 1992, on empathy (Harari, 1996;Perry, 1993;Wilkinson, 1992), on emotion (Flaskas, 1989;Krause, 1993;Smith et al, 1990), on the therapist's use of self (Hildebrand and Speed, 1995;Hardham, 1996;Real, 1990), on the therapist's position in therapy (Anderson and Goolishian, 1992;Hoffman, 1993;Paterson, 1996), and on other issues surrounding the therapeutic relationship and the therapist-family system (Anderson, 1992;Cecchin et al, 1993;Flaskas, 1994;Flaskas and Perlesz, 1996b;Gibney, 1991;Gorrell Barnes and Henessy, 1995;Hedges and Lang, 1993;MacKinnon, 1993).…”
Section: Theorizing Engagement In Systemic Therapymentioning
confidence: 99%