1972
DOI: 10.1093/jee/65.2.606
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Relationship of Artificial Pod Removal to Soybean Yields

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

3
12
0

Year Published

1979
1979
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
3
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the case of cotton compensation occurs because flower production continues for a longer period of time than normal when bolls are removed or damaged (Adkisson et al, 1964). In soybeans, yields are not reduced because plants compensate for pod loss by increasing the weight of seeds in remaining pods (Smith and Bass, 1972). A similar reaction to that of soybeans has been noted in Zea mays following partial destruction of ear corn by redwinged blackbirds (Aeglaius phoeniceus L.) (Dyar, 1975).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 84%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the case of cotton compensation occurs because flower production continues for a longer period of time than normal when bolls are removed or damaged (Adkisson et al, 1964). In soybeans, yields are not reduced because plants compensate for pod loss by increasing the weight of seeds in remaining pods (Smith and Bass, 1972). A similar reaction to that of soybeans has been noted in Zea mays following partial destruction of ear corn by redwinged blackbirds (Aeglaius phoeniceus L.) (Dyar, 1975).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…Agricultural studies of the effects of herbivores on the growth, development, and reproduction of crop plants indicate that some species such as cotton and soybeans are able to respond to and compensate for the removal of flowers and immature fruits so that yields are either not affected or may even increase (Dale 1959;Smith and Bass, 1972;Thomas et al, 1974). In the case of cotton compensation occurs because flower production continues for a longer period of time than normal when bolls are removed or damaged (Adkisson et al, 1964).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, this reproductive inhibition may be mitigated by increased seed viability within the few seed capsules that are produced. Does M. quinquenervia compensate for herbivory by increasing seed viability (Smith & Bass, 1972)? These data demonstrate that natural herbivory levels and frequencies tested herein do not influence seed number, embryony or viability (Table 3).…”
Section: Controlmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For most species studied to date, defoliation close to flowering and fruit development has a greater effect than earlier leaf removal (e.g. Knight & Hollowell 1962;Smith & Bass 1972;Turnipseed 1972;Hare 1980;Islam & Crawley 1983;Maschinski & Whitham 1989;Obeso & Grubb 1994), suggesting that these species may rely more on current photosynthate than on stored carbohydrates. Betula pubescens (Haukioja et al 1990) is an exception and, like P. arieianum, is most sensitive to herbivory in advance of flower and fruit production.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%