2020
DOI: 10.3390/app10238598
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Relationship of Cepstral Peak Prominence-Smoothed and Long-Term Average Spectrum with Auditory–Perceptual Analysis

Abstract: Cepstral peak prominence-smoothed (CPPs) and long-term average spectrum (LTAS) are robust measures that represent the glottal source and source-filter interactions, respectively. Until now, little has been known about how physiological events impact auditory–perceptual characteristics in the objective measures of CPPs and LTAS (alpha ratio; L1–L0). Thus, this paper aims to analyze the relationship between such acoustic measures and auditory–perceptual analysis and then determine which acoustic measure best rep… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
4
0
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
1
4
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The current results for CPPs (M = 16.3 dB; W = 16.1 dB) are comparable to those from previous studies including Núñez-Batalla et al (M = 16.0 dB; W = 16.4 dB) [27] and Angélica et al (16.44 dB) [27,28]. It was also higher than several previous studies [6,10,11,23].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…The current results for CPPs (M = 16.3 dB; W = 16.1 dB) are comparable to those from previous studies including Núñez-Batalla et al (M = 16.0 dB; W = 16.4 dB) [27] and Angélica et al (16.44 dB) [27,28]. It was also higher than several previous studies [6,10,11,23].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…13 Measurement does not require a stable fundamental frequency, unlike jitter, shimmer, and harmonics-to-noise ratio measures. 13,16 CPP is a reliable correlate to perceptual ratings of voice quality 17 and the severity and duration of voice disorders, 18 even for severely aperiodic signals such as tracheoesophageal voice. 19 Given these advantages and the large number of conditions in our study, we used CPP as an analog for voice quality.…”
Section: Measurement Of Cppmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…CPPS values have been analyzed in studies, mainly in the comparison of individuals with voices classified as healthy and dysphonic individuals. The values presented range from 6.92 to 16.44 dB for healthy voices and from 4.57 to 14.99 for dysphonic voices (2,(23)(24)(25)(26)(27)(28) . These values confirm the findings of this study, in which the average CPPS for the vowel was 14.53 pretherapy and 16.37 post-therapy, values that indicate the vocal improvement that occurred with the therapeutic intervention.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%