2021
DOI: 10.11607/prd.4429
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Relationship of Gingival Phenotypes and Faciolingual Thickness, Papilla Height, and Gingival Angle in a Chinese Population

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

1
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
1
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Conversely, there was also a significant negative correlation between CEJ-ABC and GA, PA, BMA, and IBA. This finding matched those observed in earlier studies where the GA of a thin biotype appeared smaller, and its gingival margin was more curved compared to its thicker counterpart [ 28 , 44 , 45 ]. Various investigations demonstrated that a thicker gingival phenotype often correlated with wider tooth crowns and more robust, shorter gingival papilla [ 46 50 ].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Conversely, there was also a significant negative correlation between CEJ-ABC and GA, PA, BMA, and IBA. This finding matched those observed in earlier studies where the GA of a thin biotype appeared smaller, and its gingival margin was more curved compared to its thicker counterpart [ 28 , 44 , 45 ]. Various investigations demonstrated that a thicker gingival phenotype often correlated with wider tooth crowns and more robust, shorter gingival papilla [ 46 50 ].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Various investigations demonstrated that a thicker gingival phenotype often correlated with wider tooth crowns and more robust, shorter gingival papilla [ 46 50 ]. The contour of gingival margin is primarily influenced by parameters like GA, PW, and PH [ 45 ]. Therefore, when designing the morphology of anterior implant restorations, SGTDs was a critical factor in guiding the aesthetic contour of the gingival margin.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%