Proceedings of SPE Unconventional Gas Recovery Symposium 1982
DOI: 10.2523/10800-ms
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Relationship of Methane Content of Coal Rank and Depth: Theoretical vs. Observed

Abstract: Prediction of gas content of coalbeds, and therefore potential producibility, has relied primarily on its observed relationship to coal rank, pressure, and the methane adsorption capacity of a given coal. This relationship has been illustrated by the construction of adsorption isotherms for various coals from experimental data. These adsorption isotherms were developed for sized, clean coal particles. The value and limitations of these adsorption isotherms are addressed by relating them to observed coalbed met… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0
1

Year Published

1987
1987
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
5
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This is not surprising, and is in agreement with the high rank of the Gething coals. However, the adsorption capacities are slightly higher than those obtained based on the Eddy et al (1982) curves and those estimated using the Ryan (1992) equation, which is a theoretical equation based on empirical relationships. Maximum gas-holding capacity of Gething coals at 1,000 m depth and 1.7% Ro,max ranges from 22-27 cc/g (daf) (700-870 scf/ton), whereas gas content estimated using the Eddy curves and the Ryan Equation is about 17 cc/g (daf) (545 scf/ton).…”
Section: Adsorption Datamentioning
confidence: 51%
“…This is not surprising, and is in agreement with the high rank of the Gething coals. However, the adsorption capacities are slightly higher than those obtained based on the Eddy et al (1982) curves and those estimated using the Ryan (1992) equation, which is a theoretical equation based on empirical relationships. Maximum gas-holding capacity of Gething coals at 1,000 m depth and 1.7% Ro,max ranges from 22-27 cc/g (daf) (700-870 scf/ton), whereas gas content estimated using the Eddy curves and the Ryan Equation is about 17 cc/g (daf) (545 scf/ton).…”
Section: Adsorption Datamentioning
confidence: 51%
“…This has significant implications for the regional CBM potential, since it is known from early artificial coalification experiments (Karweil, 1956) that coal starts to generate substantial volumes of thermally derived methane once the high volatile bituminous rank is achieved, corresponding to a vitrinite reflectance level of approximately 0.7% Rrandom (Choate et al, 1986). It is also known that the methane adsorption capacity of coals increase with coal rank (Kim, 1976;Eddy et al, 1982;Meissner, 1984;Dawson and Kalkreuth, 1994), making the northeastern part of the Santa Terezinha Coalfield the prime candidate for onshore CBM exploration.…”
Section: Evaluation Of Cbm Resource Potentialmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Thermally derived methane in coal starts to form at a rank of high volatile bituminous coal (vitrinite reflectance between 0.6 and 0.7% Ro) and methane content can reach 400 cc/g at the rank of anthracite (Karweil, 1956). The methane storage capacity of coals is likewise influenced by coal grade, coal type and coal rank, but is also affected by other parameters such as reservoir depth, temperature, coal moisture content and structural setting (Eddy et al, 1982;Kaiser et al, 1992;Dawson and Kalkreuth, 1994).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…A geração do metano está relacionada diretamente com o grau de carbonificação da matéria orgânica, que, por sua vez, dependerá das condições de temperatura e pressão às quais a sucessão estratigráfica foi submetida (Murray 1991apud Bustin & Clarkson 1998. O metano gerado termicamente nos carvões começa a se formar a partir do rank betuminoso alto volátil (com refletância da vitrinita entre 0,6 e 0,7% Ro) (Karweil 1956 estrutural (Eddy et al 1982;Kaiser et al 1992;Dawson & Kalkreuth 1994). As análises petrográficas e químicas e a interpretação dos resultados obtidos no presente estudo indicaram que o carvão da Formação Rio Bonito da jazida Sul Catarinense tem as características necessárias para a geração de gás, principalmente as camadas Barro Branco e Irapuá, por apresentarem o rank necessário para a geração de gás, alto conteúdo de vitrinita e baixo teor de matéria mineral, enquanto a camada Bonito apresenta baixo potencial devido ao alto conteúdo de matéria mineral.…”
Section: Conclusõesunclassified