Relationship of negative and positive core beliefs about the self with dysfunctional attitudes in three aspects of life

Otani, Koichi; Suzuki, Akihito; Matsumoto, Yoshihiko; Shirata, Toshinori

doi:10.2147/ndt.s150537

Cited by 14 publications

(13 citation statements)

References 5 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The study demonstrated that negative self-evaluation was associated with dysfunctional attitude in all three areas i.e. achievement, dependency and self-control [11]. Contrary to common belief, the study indicated positive self-evaluation was actually related to dysfunctional attitude in achievement and selfcontrol [11].…”

Section: Introductioncontrasting

confidence: 61%

“…A research done in Japan studied the relationship of negative and positive evaluation of self, identified using Brief Core Schema Scale, with dysfunctional attitudes in three aspects of life [11]. The study demonstrated that negative self-evaluation was associated with dysfunctional attitude in all three areas i.e.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…achievement, dependency and self-control [11]. Contrary to common belief, the study indicated positive self-evaluation was actually related to dysfunctional attitude in achievement and selfcontrol [11]. Brief Core Schema Scales (BCSS) is an instrument developed by Fowler et all in order to provide a quick and easily administered measure of four subscales to evaluate the 4 dimensions of negative evaluations of self (negative schema) but also positive evaluations of self and positive and negative evaluations of others [12].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Validation of the Malay Translation of Brief Core Schema Scale (BCSS-M)

Jing

Santhiya

Devadas

et al. 2019

BJSTR

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Negative schema of self and others are closely associated with self-esteem and mood disorder. Identifying negative schema is an important step in effective psychotherapy. Brief Core Schema Scale (BCSS) is a validated and reliable scale to assess general perception about themselves and other people. The original scale is available in English. BCSS was translated to Malaysian language (BCSS-M) and validated in this study. This study involved 279 participants attending psychiatry clinic in a public hospital in Malaysia. Each participant filled up the socio-demographic forms and BCSS. The results of the study showed that BCSS-M demonstrated good internal consistency with Cronbach's α of 0.73. BCSS-M also exhibited good convergent and discriminant validity. Confirmatory factor analysis showed that it best fit into a 4 factor model. In conclusion, BCSS-M demonstrated good psychometric properties.

show abstract

Section: Introductioncontrasting

confidence: 61%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Validation of the Malay Translation of Brief Core Schema Scale (BCSS-M)

Jing

Santhiya

Devadas

et al. 2019

BJSTR

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…It follows that adolescents with different personality traits probably have different self-evaluation. Compared to parental bonding and personality traits, little research has been done on the impact of the third group of factors, the psychological status of adolescents on their self-evaluation [17,18]. Some studies have shown that negativity, attachment anxiety or depression are described as feelings of helplessness and weakness, fear of being abandoned, and hope to be cared for, loved and protected [19][20][21].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

The Influencing Factors of Self-evaluation in Adolescents: A Structural Equation Modeling

Zhai

Zhang

Eshak

et al. 2021

Preprint

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background Adolescents’ self-evaluation is an expressive form of their self-concept. Parental bonding, personality traits and psychological status were the three main determining factors of adolescents’ self-evaluation; however, no study has tested the effects of the three variables simultaneously. We aimed to explore these effects by a systematic approach. Methods Data came from the Chinese Family Panel Studies (CFPS). The associations of parental bonding (measured by the Parental Bonding Instrument), personality traits (the Responsibility Scale) and psychological status (the Kessler Psychological Distress Scale, K6) with self-evaluation measured in three domains (the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale, the Nowicki-Strickland Locus of Control Scale for children and the Self-Discipline Scale) were tested by the structural equation modeling (SEM) analysis. Results A total of 892 Chinese adolescents (Average age = 10.72, SD = 0.89) were included. Significant positive correlations were found among self-evaluation, parental bonding, personality traits and psychological status. The overall (direct and indirect) effect of parental bonding on adolescents’ self-evaluation was 0.49 (parental bonding→ self-evaluation, β = 0.28; parental bonding→ personality traits and psychological status→ self-evaluation, β = 0.21). Personality traits and psychological status were directly associated with adolescents’ self-evaluation (personality trait→ self-evaluation, β = 0.78 and K6→ self-evaluation, β = 0.39). Conclusions The use of SEM offered a detailed analysis of the correlations between parental bonding, personality traits, and psychological status, and a systematic approach to investigating their direct and indirect effects on adolescents’ self-evaluation. The three factors were directly associated with adolescents’ self-evaluation and parental bonding had an indirect effect on adolescents’ self-evaluation that was mediated by both personality traits and psychological status.

show abstract

“…The second group of factors that affects adolescents' self-evaluation is related to the personality traits [9,10] which contribute to the diversity in personal, emotional, motivational and social behaviours of adolescents [11,12]. Compared to parental bonding and personality traits, little research has been done on the impact of the third group of factors; the psychological status of adolescents on their self-evaluation [13,14]. Adolescents with negative core beliefs, attachment anxiety, or low self-esteem were described as exhibiting behaviors that re ect a negative self-image and then compensate for that, which implies that they act in accord with negative self-patterns in order to gain positive self-respect [15].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

The Influencing Factors of Self-evaluation in Adolescents: A Structural Equation Modeling

Zhai

Eshak

et al. 2020

Preprint

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background: Adolescents’ self-evaluation is an expressive form of their self-concept. Parental bonding, personality traits and psychological status were determining factors of adolescents’ self-evaluation; however, no study has tested the effects of the three variables simultaneously. We aimed to explore these effects by a systematic approach. Methods: Data came from the Chinese Family Panel Studies (CFPS). The associations of parental bonding (measured by the Parental Bonding Instrument), personality traits (the Responsibility Scale) and psychological status (the Kessler Psychological Distress Scale, K6) with self-evaluation measured in three domains (the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale, the Nowicki-Strickland Locus of Control Scale for children and the Self-Discipline Scale) were tested by the structural equation modeling (SEM) analysis. Results: A total of 892 Chinese adolescents (Mage in years=10.72, SD = 0.89) were included. Signiﬁcant positive correlations were found among self-evaluation, parental bonding, personality traits and psychological status. The overall (direct and indirect) effects of parental bonding on adolescents’ self-evaluation was 0.49 (parental bonding→ self-evaluation, β=0.28; parental bonding→ personality traits and psychological status→ self-evaluation, β=0.21). Personality traits and psychological status were directly associated with adolescents’ self-evaluation (personality trait→ self-evaluation, β=0.78 and K6→ self-evaluation, β=0.39). Conclusions: The use of SEM offered a detailed analysis of the correlations between parental bonding, personality traits, and psychological status, and a systematic approach to investigate their direct and indirect effects on adolescents’ self-evaluation. The three factors were directly associated with adolescents’ self-evaluation and parental bonding had an indirect effect on adolescents’ self-evaluation that was mediated by both personality traits and psychological status.

show abstract

Relationship of negative and positive core beliefs about the self with dysfunctional attitudes in three aspects of life

Cited by 14 publications

References 5 publications

Validation of the Malay Translation of Brief Core Schema Scale (BCSS-M)

Validation of the Malay Translation of Brief Core Schema Scale (BCSS-M)

The Influencing Factors of Self-evaluation in Adolescents: A Structural Equation Modeling

The Influencing Factors of Self-evaluation in Adolescents: A Structural Equation Modeling

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About