2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodres.2011.06.034
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Relationship of PROP (6-n-propylthiouracil) taster status with body mass index, food preferences, and consumption of Filipino adolescents

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
17
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
1
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the present study, the classification of the children's taste sensitivity based on PROP test strips led to 13% nontasters, 51% medium-tasters, and 36% supertasters (Table 6). This distribution is in accordance with a previous taste sensitivity study that reported the clusters of the taste phenotype consisting of 7% nontasters, 59% medium-tasters, and 34% supertasters in 13-17-year-old children [74]. Additionally, Mennella et al [75] also concluded that there are age differences in PROP responsiveness, suggesting that when matched for the TAS2R38 genotype, children tend to be more sensitive than adults.…”
Section: Relationships Between Taste Sensitivities Measured By Differsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…In the present study, the classification of the children's taste sensitivity based on PROP test strips led to 13% nontasters, 51% medium-tasters, and 36% supertasters (Table 6). This distribution is in accordance with a previous taste sensitivity study that reported the clusters of the taste phenotype consisting of 7% nontasters, 59% medium-tasters, and 34% supertasters in 13-17-year-old children [74]. Additionally, Mennella et al [75] also concluded that there are age differences in PROP responsiveness, suggesting that when matched for the TAS2R38 genotype, children tend to be more sensitive than adults.…”
Section: Relationships Between Taste Sensitivities Measured By Differsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Goldstein and colleagues (60) did not find a relationship between PROP status and BMI percentile in preadolescent children, even though nontasters in this study reported consuming more daily energy compared with supertasters. In addition, no relationship was found between PROP taster status and BMI in a sample of 120 Filipino adolescents ages 13 to 17 (22), but null results may be due to ethnic and cultural differences. Other studies conducted in ethnically and socioeconomically diverse cohorts also dispute the notion that PROP insensitivity is a marker for higher body weights in children.…”
Section: Prop Status Tas2r38 and Body Weightmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…The majority of studies that have found differences between dietary intake as a function of PROP status have utilized food frequency questionnaires (77,78) or measured ad libitum intake (15,54,75). Most studies that have used self-report diet recalls or food diaries have not seen any relationship with PROP status (5,22,50,101,102,134). The biases inherent in methods for dietary reporting have been thoroughly discussed, and all methods have obvious strengths and limitations.…”
Section: Conclusion and Directions For Future Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Taste perception was assessed in all 13 papers: 5 papers conducted taste phenotype measures [40][41][42]47,52], 3 papers conducted taste genotype measures [45,50,51], and 5 papers measures both phenotype and genotype [43,44,46,48,49].…”
Section: Study Characteristicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bitter was the most studied taste in 9 papers. 6 papers used 6-n-propylthiouracil (PROP) [40,41,43,44,48,49] and 1 used phenylthiocarbamide (PTC) [52] to test bitter taste, while 6 papers genotyped the following single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs): rs713598, rs1726866, and rs10246939 in the gene TAS2R38 [43][44][45][46]48,49].…”
Section: Study Characteristicsmentioning
confidence: 99%