2003
DOI: 10.1037/0735-7028.34.5.514
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Relationship of referral source, race, and wait time on preintake attrition.

Abstract: This study assessed whether referral source, client race, and wait time contributed to the preintake dropout rates in a large urban community mental health center in the northwestern United States. The data were collected from archival records maintained by the mental health agency's intake department. A total of 1,105 participants were documented over a 2-year period spanning 2000 and 2001. The results indicated that individuals who referred themselves for services were more likely to attend an initial intake… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
26
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
1
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…With respect to treatment adherence, high treatment acceptability was indicated by a low withdrawal rate (9%). Literature points to withdrawal rates of between 36 and 47% for psychotherapy across various settings ( Garfield, 1994 , Sparks et al, 2003 , Wierzbicki and Pekarik, 1993 ), an average withdrawal rate of 19% for group treatments of depression ( Mcdermut et al, 2001 ) and comparable rates for computerised or web-based treatment programs ( Melville et al, 2010 , Waller and Gilbody, 2009 ). Whether high satisfaction and adherence can be transferred into naturalistic settings warrants future investigation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With respect to treatment adherence, high treatment acceptability was indicated by a low withdrawal rate (9%). Literature points to withdrawal rates of between 36 and 47% for psychotherapy across various settings ( Garfield, 1994 , Sparks et al, 2003 , Wierzbicki and Pekarik, 1993 ), an average withdrawal rate of 19% for group treatments of depression ( Mcdermut et al, 2001 ) and comparable rates for computerised or web-based treatment programs ( Melville et al, 2010 , Waller and Gilbody, 2009 ). Whether high satisfaction and adherence can be transferred into naturalistic settings warrants future investigation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Importantly, though wait-time is assumed within the clinical lore to be a barrier to service utilization and has been suggested to be so in some bivariate analyses, the full magnitude of impact after controlling for other consumer factors has not been adequately examined. As others have suggested when addressing the issue of pre-intake and early appointment attrition in mental health populations, a multi-dimensional explanatory model is likely to be necessary (Freund et al 1991;Sparks et al 2003). Additionally, wait-time may interact with certain consumer variables in its impact on attrition.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…There is also some evidence that type of disorder may play a role (Kazdin, Mazurick, & Bass, 1993; Pelkonen et al, 2000) and that different factors may be related to attrition within different diagnostic groups (Johnson et al, 2009). In the adult attrition literature, additional risk factors have been studied, including referral source and wait time (Sparks, Daniels, & Johnson, 2003); however, these factors have not been extensively evaluated in youth mental health services.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%