2009
DOI: 10.1002/jmri.21947
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Relationship of temporal resolution to diagnostic performance for dynamic contrast enhanced MRI of the breast

Abstract: Purpose: To investigate the relationship between temporal resolution of dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and classification of breast lesions as benign versus malignant. Materials and Methods:Patients underwent T 1 -weighted DCE MRI with 15 s/acquisition temporal resolution using 1.5 Tesla (n ¼ 48) and 3.0T (n ¼ 33) MRI scanners. Seventy-nine patients had pathologically proven diagnosis and 2 had 2 years follow-up showing no change in lesion size. The temporal resolution of DCE … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
108
0
2

Year Published

2010
2010
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 182 publications
(117 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
7
108
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…31 In the present study, the ROC analysis revealed that the different ALFF areas of both the PCPI-Fs and the PCPI-Ms showed high AUC values and high degree of sensitivities and specificities. However, the different ALFF areas of total PCPIs showed one poor, two fair, and one good AUC value, with neither high degree of sensitivity nor specificity.…”
Section: Alff Analysis Shows High Sensitivity and Specificitysupporting
confidence: 55%
“…31 In the present study, the ROC analysis revealed that the different ALFF areas of both the PCPI-Fs and the PCPI-Ms showed high AUC values and high degree of sensitivities and specificities. However, the different ALFF areas of total PCPIs showed one poor, two fair, and one good AUC value, with neither high degree of sensitivity nor specificity.…”
Section: Alff Analysis Shows High Sensitivity and Specificitysupporting
confidence: 55%
“…As seen in Fig. 6, the literature classifier used in conjunction with the 3TP method yields good results (AUCN0.8) regardless of the temporal resolution and is comparable to similar studies with other semiquantitative analysis methods [34]. As mentioned in Ref.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 77%
“…As with previous analyses of various diagnostic techniques [18,34], the pathology-proven diagnoses allowed the selection of a retrospectively determined classifier for optimally distinguishing benign and malignant lesions. This was especially useful for the ETK analysis, where no consensus has been reached on how to classify lesions based on the estimated parameters.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…AUC scores demonstrated good-to-excellent 41 Inclusion of demographic data as independent variables did not alter binary pain classification model performance.…”
Section: Binary Classification Of Clinically Significant Pain By Cvmlmentioning
confidence: 85%