2013
DOI: 10.1103/physrevb.87.094303
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Relationship of thermal boundary conductance to structure from an analytical model plus molecular dynamics simulations

Abstract: Thermal boundary resistance dominates the overall resistance of nanosystems. This effect can be utilized to improve the figure of merit of thermoelectric materials. It is also a concern for thermal failures in microelectronic devices. The interfacial resistance sensitively depends on many interrelated structural details including material properties of the two layers, the system dimensions, the interfacial morphology, and the defect concentrations near the interface. The lack of an analytical understanding of … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

5
68
0
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 89 publications
(74 citation statements)
references
References 79 publications
5
68
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This approach has been used in two ways: (a) lattice dynamics simulations (36,53,65) and (b) wave packet transmission calculations (66,67).…”
Section: Reciprocal Space Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This approach has been used in two ways: (a) lattice dynamics simulations (36,53,65) and (b) wave packet transmission calculations (66,67).…”
Section: Reciprocal Space Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3 can serve as a validation of our previous potential development for MD simulations. 35,36 Furthermore, the thermal boundary conductance between Au FIG. 3.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We observe that the two commonly applied models, the acoustic mismatch model (AMM) and diffuse mismatch model (DMM), do not necessarily lead to values that are comparable to the available experimental data [1,15,17,18]. In all cases, it is clear that the shapes of embedded elements and/or interfaces have an important impact on the TBR [5], [6], [10] [19], [20].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 84%