2020
DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2020191606
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Relationship of Tumor Radiation–absorbed Dose to Survival and Response in Hepatocellular Carcinoma Treated with Transarterial Radioembolization with 90Y in the SARAH Study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
84
1
4

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 144 publications
(94 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
5
84
1
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Several studies on pre- and post-therapy imaging indicate the recommended threshold tumour dose [ 31 , 52 , 53 ] (R38, Table 2 ). In the SARAH trial (using BSA method), a post hoc analysis of putative delivered dose based on 99m Tc-MAA SPECT/CT showed that OS and disease control were significantly better with a tumour-absorbed dose ≥ 100 Gy [ 32 ]. The probability of disease control at 6 months was 72% (95% CI 46–89%) and 81% (95% CI 58–93%) with a tumour-absorbed dose of 100 Gy and 120 Gy, respectively.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several studies on pre- and post-therapy imaging indicate the recommended threshold tumour dose [ 31 , 52 , 53 ] (R38, Table 2 ). In the SARAH trial (using BSA method), a post hoc analysis of putative delivered dose based on 99m Tc-MAA SPECT/CT showed that OS and disease control were significantly better with a tumour-absorbed dose ≥ 100 Gy [ 32 ]. The probability of disease control at 6 months was 72% (95% CI 46–89%) and 81% (95% CI 58–93%) with a tumour-absorbed dose of 100 Gy and 120 Gy, respectively.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Quality Assurance in Interventional Oncology is an initiative to improve quality assurance in interventional oncology, amongst which post-intervention follow-ups and imaging are one of the quality standards [70] Another limitation has been the timing of the study. In the last years, research on TARE has provided insights in the importance of biomarkers, genetic information and tumour absorbed dose on the oncological outcomes [39,[65][66][67][68][69]. As CIRT was designed before these insights were accepted and applied, data on these outcomes have not been included in the objectives of the study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the original publication on the SARAH trial [47], no difference in survival was found between SIRT with resin 90 Y microspheres and sorafenib treatment. However, in this secondary analysis, a clear dose-response relationship has been found, as the highest disease control rate was found in patients of whom the predicted tumour dose exceeded 100 Gy and in whom there was an optimal agreement between 99m Tc-MAA SPECT and 90 Y-SPECT or 90 Y-PET post-treatment [38]. The second study is the DOSISPHERE-01 trial, which is the first prospective study in nuclear medicine therapy designed to elucidate the benefit of personalized dosimetric treatment planning, in this case, a personalized dose of glass 90 Y microspheres to patients with HCC.…”
Section: Hepatocellular Carcinoma (Hcc)mentioning
confidence: 78%
“…One study has attempted to make an estimation of the T/N ratio by incorporating the hypervascularization status (based on CT imaging) into a volumetric partition model [30]. A total of 11 studies have predicted the tumour doses based on 99m Tc-MAA SPECT [5,12,26,[31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38], four have imaged the microsphere distribution with 90 Y-SPECT [39][40][41][42], and six studies have utilized 90 Y-PET [3,12,[43][44][45][46]. This has also resulted in a very wide range of reported dose thresholds, varying from 61 Gy to 1000 Gy, with the majority being between 100 and 250 Gy (13/19 studies; 68%).…”
Section: Hepatocellular Carcinoma (Hcc)mentioning
confidence: 99%