Relationship quality in higher education and the interplay with student engagement and loyalty

Abstract

Background. To date, studies that have investigated the bonds between students and their institution have emphasized the importance of student-staff relationships. Measuring the quality of those relationships (i.e., relationship quality) appears to help with investigating the relational ties students have with their higher education institutions. Growing interest has arisen in further investigating relationship quality in higher education, as it might predict students' involvement with the institution (e.g., student engagement and student loyalty). So far, most studies have used a cross-sectional design, so that causality could not be determined.Aims. The aim of this longitudinal study was twofold. First, we investigated the temporal ordering of the relation between the relationship quality dimensions of trust (in benevolence and honesty) and affect (satisfaction, affective commitment, and affective conflict). Second, we examined the ordering of the paths between relationship quality, student engagement, and student loyalty. Our objectives were to gain a deeper understanding of the relationship quality construct in higher education and its later outcomes.Sample. Participants (N = 1649) were students from three Dutch higher education institutions who were studying in a technology economics or social sciences program.Methods. Longitudinal data from two time points were used to evaluate two types of cross-lagged panel models. In the first analysis, we could not assume measurement invariance for affective conflict over time. Therefore, we tested an alternative model without affective conflict, using the latent variables of trust and affect, the student engagement dimensions and student loyalty. In the second type of model, we investigated the manifest variables of relationship quality, student engagement, and student loyalty. The hypotheses were tested by evaluating simultaneous comparisons between estimates.This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non-commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.

Loyalty in Digital Learning: Exploring Service Quality, Satisfaction, and Trust in Open Flexible Distance Education

“…Conversely, a lack of trust can erode loyalty, leading to disengagement, apathy, and detachment from the learning process. Thus, cultivating trust among students is not merely a precursor but a catalyst for fostering loyalty, nurturing a harmonious ecosystem where mutual respect and support propel individuals toward academic excellence and personal fulfilment (Snijders et al, 2022). In this intricate dance between trust and loyalty, students emerge not only as learners but as active contributors to a vibrant educational community, united by their shared commitment to growth and success (Elista et al, 2022).…”

Should I Leave My Country? Higher Education Value Shaping Students’ Satisfaction and Brain Drain Intentions in Western Balkans

“…Indeed, students in earlier years of the degree might have an initial understanding of the higher education environment, which can later vary due to the ensuing experience with the provided educational service. The interaction with the service and the interpretation of the opportunities can be different for students in higher courses, because of adequate guidance and relationship quality thorough the degree, which positively influences students’ engagement and loyalty behaviors (Snijders et al, 2022). Hence, students might not have the same insights at the beginning of their studies, and once they have advanced toward higher courses, which can cause changes in the satisfaction, they show with higher education services (Burgess et al, 2018; Ledden & Kalafatis, 2010; Woodall, 2003).…”

Predictors and outcomes of nursing students' engagement trajectories at the beginning of their program

“…Rather, a significant part of engagement research seems to have stagnated on studying the intricacies of how engagement is experienced at any given point in time, without giving much thought to its dynamic evolution. Indeed, the bulk of research on engagement has so far relied on cross-sectional designs, or on limited longitudinal designs (including only two measurement points; Gillet et al, 2020b;Snijders et al, 2022), making it impossible to entirely capture the dynamic nature of engagement trajectories (Fletcher et al, 2018;Zhu et al, 2019). To inform this issue, which is a core objective of the present study, more extensive longitudinal designs (i.e., including three or more time points and thus allowing for the estimation of the shape taken by engagement trajectories over time) are necessary (e.g., Ployhart & Vandenberg, 2010).…”