Relationship Velocity: Toward a Theory of Relationship Dynamics

Abstract

The dynamic components of relational constructs should play an important role in driving performance. To take an initial step toward a theory of relationship dynamics, the authors introduce the construct of commitment velocity—or the rate and direction of change in commitment—and articulate its important role in understanding relationships. In two studies, the authors demonstrate that commitment velocity has a strong impact on performance, beyond the impact of the level of commitment. In Study 1, modeling six years of longitudinal data in a latent growth curve analysis, the authors empirically demonstrate the significance of commitment velocity as a predictor of performance. In Study 2, the authors use matched multiple-source data to investigate the drivers of commitment velocity. Both customer trust and dynamic capabilities for creating value through exchange relationships (i.e., communication capabilities for exploring and investment capabilities for exploiting opportunities) affect commitment velocity. However, trust and communication capabilities become less impactful as a relationship ages, while investment capabilities grow more important. The authors offer three post hoc tenets that represent initial components of a theory of relationship dynamics that integrates two streams of relationship marketing research into a unified perspective.

B2B Channel Partner Programs: Disentangling Indebtedness from Gratitude

“…However, with some notable exceptions (Samaha et al 2011;Steinhoff and Palmatier 2014), existing marketing research has focused on the positive side of relational exchanges and neglected indebtedness, thus failing to capture the intricacies of an ongoing exchange and underestimating its performance-harming aspects. In addition, recent research has consistently called for research to incorporate longitudinal research designs to disentangle the intricate effects in relationship marketing (Palmatier et al 2007;Palmatier et al 2013). We build on this emerging literature base and adopt a multi-wave approach to study indebtedness and gratitude.…”

Interfirm Relational Strategies and Innovation: the Role of Interfirm Relational Traits and Firm Resources

“…Interfirm relational theory (e.g., [9,65,67]) suggests that positive traits in a firm's relationships with its suppliers (or customers) are important for generating productive outcomes. Specifically, relational strategies influence the extents of both information flows and relational embeddedness between a firm and its suppliers [30].…”

“…With this premise, we interpreted the relationships among relational strategies, IFR traits, and innovation outcomes. However, recent research suggests that relationships may change over time (e.g., [67]), so additional studies should explore how changes in relational dynamics and velocity affect a firm's outcomes, such as innovation. Relational embeddedness (newly developed scale based on Noordhoff et al [63]; construct reliability=0.923; AVE= 0.751; range of loadings 0.787-0.915; scale items anchored by 1=Bstrongly disagree^and 5=Bstrongly agree^)…”

A conceptual framework towards understanding the relationship between a sport organization and its sponsors

“…Relationship marketing definitions have varied according to disciplines and context where the research is conducted(KIM; TRAIL, 2011). Researchers proposed numerous definitions trying to better understand the nature of relationship marketing (COUSENS; BABIAK; BRADISH, 2006;KIM;TRAIL, 2011;MORGAN;HUNT, 1994;PALMATIERet al,2006;PALMATIER et al, 2013;SPEGORIN, 2010) Although there is variation in the perspective and approaches about relationship marketing, usually they address three aspects of the relationship marketing: process, purpose and the involved (KIM; TRAIL, Rev. Ciênc.…”