2005
DOI: 10.1672/0277-5212(2005)025[0685:raefvz]2.0.co;2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Relationships among environmental factors, vegetation zones, and species richness in a North American calcareous prairie fen

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

3
14
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
3
14
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Nutrient availability in prairie fen is low, a factor that contributes to the high plant species diversity (Boeye et al 1997;Nekola 2004;Bowles et al 2005). In our study, we did not find significant differences in soil nitrogen, phosphorous, or potassium between invaded and uninvaded fen, although nitrate, ammonia, phosphorous, and potassium levels were all numerically higher in invaded areas.…”
Section: Nutrient Availabilitycontrasting
confidence: 63%
“…Nutrient availability in prairie fen is low, a factor that contributes to the high plant species diversity (Boeye et al 1997;Nekola 2004;Bowles et al 2005). In our study, we did not find significant differences in soil nitrogen, phosphorous, or potassium between invaded and uninvaded fen, although nitrate, ammonia, phosphorous, and potassium levels were all numerically higher in invaded areas.…”
Section: Nutrient Availabilitycontrasting
confidence: 63%
“…The strong influence of topography on species composition reflects multiple edaphic characteristics that vary with site elevation: flood frequency, fire frequency, and a host of chemical attributes of soil including pH, oxygen, and nutrient availability (e.g., Schalles and Shure 1989, Svenning 2001, De Steven and Toner 2004, Bowles et al 2005, Dick and Gilliam 2007, Laliberte et al 2007.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Others (e.g., high deer and beaver populations) may be more manageable at the local level, but uncertainty or disagreement over how much management is allowed (i.e., ''nature knows best'') often prevents effect measures from being implemented. Fens are particularly vulnerable to land cover/land use changes that affect the supply of base-rich groundwater, sedimentation, and increased inputs of Na and Cl from urban pollution (Grace 1999; Bowles et al 2005), and management strategies that minimize impacts on wetland hydrology are perhaps most critical for Abe Run. Although public ownership brings protection from some disturbances (e.g., fire, local landscape alteration), impacts of others (e.g., high deer population, road building, public visitation) may have been increased.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%