2013
DOI: 10.1051/fruits/2013078
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Relationships among postharvest ripening attributes and storage disorders in ‘Honeycrisp’ apple

Abstract: -Introduction. The objective of this study was to examine the relationships among the ripening attributes of 'Honeycrisp' apples at harvest and after storage, and the direct and indirect contributions of these attributes to peel greasiness and the incidence of soft scald and soggy breakdown during storage using correlation and path-coefficient analyses. Materials and methods. Fruit were harvested from a commercial orchard at least five times throughout the commercial harvest period during four subsequent years… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Only one variable, ethylene, emerged to explain a significant portion of the model, revealing that disorder incidence declined as IEC at harvest increased. This was reminiscent of the findings of Ehsani-Moghaddam and DeEll (2013) in which a strong negative correlation was found between soft scald and IEC at harvest. DeEll and Ehsani-Moghaddam (2012b) found ethylene to be implicated in the sensitivity of 'Empire' apple fruit to CO 2 -related storage injury.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 64%
“…Only one variable, ethylene, emerged to explain a significant portion of the model, revealing that disorder incidence declined as IEC at harvest increased. This was reminiscent of the findings of Ehsani-Moghaddam and DeEll (2013) in which a strong negative correlation was found between soft scald and IEC at harvest. DeEll and Ehsani-Moghaddam (2012b) found ethylene to be implicated in the sensitivity of 'Empire' apple fruit to CO 2 -related storage injury.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 64%
“…The estimation of SBI values with the regression equation, including both fruit quality attributes at harvest and weather conditions during the growing season, is considered adequate with 75% of the predictions that are located in the threshold of ±5% of the observed SBI (RMSE = 4.33, EF = 0.67, and E = -0.48). The main differences from the regression analyses considering only weather conditions on soggy breakdown susceptibility are the implication of fruit firmness at harvest, low temperatures from 31 to 60 DFB, and precipitation from 0 to 30 DFB, with a positive relationship between fruit firmness at harvest and soggy breakdown susceptibility (Ehsani and DeEll, 2013). Firmness varied between 56.9 and 80.2 N over all sites and years of harvest and accounted for only 7% of the variability in SBI.…”
Section: Year Of Harvestmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…This observation was not unexpected, considering how many previous studies evaluating SS and SBD in 'Honeycrisp,' which is considered highly susceptible to both disorders, often observed only small percentage of fruit develop either disorder (Tong et al 2003, DeLong et al 2004, 2006Moran et al 2009Moran et al , 2010DeEll and EhsaniMoghaddam 2010;Ehsani-Moghaddam and DeEll 2013). Some of the discrepancy between observed and expected disorder incidences when considering individual haplotype composition at the identified QTL can be attributed to experimental variation as reflected by non-systematic differences in disorder incidences between 2014 and 2015.…”
Section: Ss and Sbd Variation Due To Additional Causesmentioning
confidence: 94%