2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.cedpsych.2003.08.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Relationships among preschool English language learner’s oral proficiency in English, instructional experience and literacy development

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
63
1
12

Year Published

2010
2010
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 81 publications
(77 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
1
63
1
12
Order By: Relevance
“…Randomizing at the individual level allowed for this mix in linguistic backgrounds and varied experience with the second language between study participants. The children were assessed with Raven's Coloured Progressive Matrices, sets A, Ab, and B (Raven, Court, & Raven, 1990). The raw score mean for children in the intervention group was 14.43 (SD D 3.97), and the raw score mean for children in the control group was 13.54 (SD D 3.65).…”
Section: Participantsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Randomizing at the individual level allowed for this mix in linguistic backgrounds and varied experience with the second language between study participants. The children were assessed with Raven's Coloured Progressive Matrices, sets A, Ab, and B (Raven, Court, & Raven, 1990). The raw score mean for children in the intervention group was 14.43 (SD D 3.97), and the raw score mean for children in the control group was 13.54 (SD D 3.65).…”
Section: Participantsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most of these studies focused on phonological awareness and phonics (Calhoon, Otaiba, Cihak, King, & Avalos, 2007;Denton, Wexler, Vaughn, & Bryan, 2008;Ehri, Dreyer, Flugman, & Gross, 2007;Giambo & McKinney, 2004;Gunn, Smolkowski, Biglan, Black, & Blair, 2005;Kamps et al, 2007;Lovett et al, 2008;McMaster, Kung, Han, & Cao, 2008;Roberts & Neal, 2004;Solari & Gerber, 2008;Swanson, Hodson, & Schommer-Aikins, 2005;Troia, 2004). Findings generally confirm those of the previous review: The same principles of systematic and explicit phonologically based interventions that undergird instruction for English-proficient students also appear to benefit English language learners' (ELLs) literacy development.…”
Section: Updatementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Items are organized into two subscales: Book Knowledge and Book Comprehension. Spearman-Brown test-retest reliability was .91 (Roberts & Neal, 2004 Woodcock & Johnson , 1990) was used as a direct measure of children's ability to identify letters and words. The Woodcock-Muiioz-Revised Identificacion de Letras y Palabr as (Woodcock & Munoz-Sandoval, 1996) was used for children whose primary langu age was Spanish.…”
Section: Preacademic Skillsmentioning
confidence: 99%