Relationships among the Energy, Emergy, and Money Flows of the United States from 1900 to 2011

Abstract

Energy Systems Language models of the resource base for the U.S. economy and of economic exchange were used, respectively, (1) to show how energy consumption and emergy use contribute to real and nominal gross domestic product (GDP) and (2) to propose a model of coupled flows that explains high correlations of these inputs with measures of market-based economic activity. We examined a third power law model of growth supported by excess resources and found evidence that it has governed U.S. economic growth since 1900, i.e., nominal GDP was best explained by a power function of total emergy use with exponent 2.8. We used a weight of evidence approach to identify relationships among emergy, energy, and money flows in the U.S. from 1900 to 2011. All measures of quality adjusted energy consumption had a relationship with nominal GDP that was best described by a hyperbolic function plus a constant and the relationship between all measures of energy consumption and real GDP was best described by a second order polynomial. The fact that energy consumption per unit of real GDP declined after 1996 as real GDP continued to increase indicates that energy conservation or a shift toward less energy intensive industries has resulted in lower fossil fuel use and reduced CO 2 emissions while maintaining growth in real GDP. Since all energy consumption measures versus real GDP deviated from a power law relationship after 1996; whereas, total emergy use did not, we concluded that total emergy use captured more of the factors responsible for the increase in real GDP than did energy measures alone, and as a result, total emergy use may be the best measure to quantify the biophysical basis for social and economic activity in the information age. The emergy to money ratio measured as solar emjoules per nominal $ followed a decreasing trend from a high of 1.01E+14 semj/$ in 1902 to 1.56E+12 semj/$ in 2011 with fluctuations in its value corresponding to major periods of inflation and deflation over this time.Keywords: emergy to money ratios, emergy of the energy consumed, emergy evaluation of the U.S., quality adjusted energy consumption, nominal and real GDP, money supplies www.frontiersin.org

Comparing World Economic and Net Energy Metrics, Part 3: Macroeconomic Historical and Future Perspectives

“…These metrics of energy quality in one way or another account for "energy plus technology" rather than simply gross primary energy consumption. This quality factor is often one based upon relative prices of resources (e.g., the price per MJ is higher for oil than coal) [46], thermodynamic characterizations such as fuel exergy, technology conversion efficiency, and "useful work" delivered [5,6,10,18], or embodied energy concepts such as emergy [47,48]. The work of Ayres is particularly enlightening to show that energy, expressed as useful work (e.g., light, mechanical motion, heat, etc.…”

Emergy Evaluation of Formal Education in the United States: 1870 to 2011

“…The primary results of this study are reported in Appendix B as a table of values showing the emergy required to educate individuals to achieve varying levels of education from preschool to the doctoral degree with 2 years postdoctoral experience. The values of the emergy per individual are based on the emergy inputs to the U.S. given in [34,35]. Other results of this study are reported in the text, figures and tables presented below.…”

Emergy-Based Sustainability Analysis of an Ecologically Integrated Model with Maize Planting for Silage and Pig-Raising in the North China Plain

“…Generally, the higher emdollar one area had, the less developed it was [33]. As the near-linear correlation between real GDP and total emergy inputs [34], the UEV of the Chinese Yuan (¥) in 2017 was 3.31 × 10 11 seJ/¥ under 12.0 × 10 24 seJ/year baseline which was calculated based on the UEV (7.27 × 10 11 seJ/¥ with 9.26 × 10 24 seJ/year baseline) calculated by Yang (2010) in 2005 and the GDP deflator of 2005 to 2017 (2.84) [33,35]. In this study, the global emergy baseline was 12.00 × 10 24 seJ/year.…”