2012
DOI: 10.1080/19368623.2012.626749
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Relationships Among Tourist Profile, Satisfaction and Destination Loyalty: Examining Empirical Evidences in Antalya Region of Turkey

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

9
85
1
4

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 118 publications
(99 citation statements)
references
References 71 publications
(98 reference statements)
9
85
1
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Among the positive effects of the AIS we find an increase in the income of the tour operators and the travel agencies, the creation of opportunities of trips for tourists with not very high costs, an increase in the ratios of occupancy of the resorts, the introduction of another type of tourism products and the simplification of the commercial relations between the hotel and the guests (Alegre & Pou, 2006;Özdemir, Ehtiyar, Çizel, Çizel & Içigen, 2012). And as negative effects we find the drop in the quality of the tourism product, the decrease in the motivation of the hotel personnel, the little interaction among the tourists, basically foreigners, and the local community (Çiftci, Düzakin & Önal, 2007;Ozdemir Aksu, Ehtiyar, Çizel, & İçigen, 2012) and that this system is not appropriate for small hotels since a minimum number of rooms is needed, calculated at around 150 rooms (Anderson, 2010). The AIS is a tourism producer and that implies, therefore, an important modification of the tourism services at the destination (Alegre & Pou, 2006), mainly due to the near disappearance of the restaurant sector, as a consequence of a modification in the flow of services that are offered in the destination, since the majority of them are supplied by the hotel establishment itself.…”
Section: Review Of the Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among the positive effects of the AIS we find an increase in the income of the tour operators and the travel agencies, the creation of opportunities of trips for tourists with not very high costs, an increase in the ratios of occupancy of the resorts, the introduction of another type of tourism products and the simplification of the commercial relations between the hotel and the guests (Alegre & Pou, 2006;Özdemir, Ehtiyar, Çizel, Çizel & Içigen, 2012). And as negative effects we find the drop in the quality of the tourism product, the decrease in the motivation of the hotel personnel, the little interaction among the tourists, basically foreigners, and the local community (Çiftci, Düzakin & Önal, 2007;Ozdemir Aksu, Ehtiyar, Çizel, & İçigen, 2012) and that this system is not appropriate for small hotels since a minimum number of rooms is needed, calculated at around 150 rooms (Anderson, 2010). The AIS is a tourism producer and that implies, therefore, an important modification of the tourism services at the destination (Alegre & Pou, 2006), mainly due to the near disappearance of the restaurant sector, as a consequence of a modification in the flow of services that are offered in the destination, since the majority of them are supplied by the hotel establishment itself.…”
Section: Review Of the Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Distance is a physical variable that significantly affects tourism demand, as manifested in the applications of distance decay theory in tourism literature (e.g., Cai et al, 2008;Ozdemir et al, 2012). It has been found that the absolute volume of tourist flows declines exponentially with distance, and certain tourist segments nearly disappear when some threshold is reached (Ozdemir et al, 2012;McKercher, Chan, & Lam, 2008;Cai & Li, 2009).…”
Section: Travel Distancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Not all the resources of a destination bring competitive advantages, but only those aforementioned resources provide tourists with the unique experience sought [40]. Having such a unique experience determines tourist satisfaction and, in turn, loyalty to the destination, as well as its direct and indirect promotion [41].…”
Section: Evaluation Of Destination Tourist Resourcesmentioning
confidence: 99%