2020
DOI: 10.1007/s10344-019-1353-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Relationships among white-tailed deer density, harvest, and landscape metrics in TN, USA

Abstract: Landscape and harvest indices are frequently used to represent white-tailed deer (Odocoileus virginianus) density. However, the relationship between deer density and specific landscape indices is unclear. Harvest is another metric often used to estimate deer density. Our objective was to model the relationship among deer density, landscape metrics, and harvest density of deer in TN, USA. We estimated deer density across 11 regions in 2011 using distance sampling techniques. We developed 18 a priori models to a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We assumed those bags to represent 33% of the deer population. While bag numbers appear to offer a relatively crude method of assessing deer populations ( 35 , 36 ), they can provide good estimates of county-level populations ( 30 ) ( Supplementary Table 2 ). A variety of Sika density estimates were produced for each county by dividing population estimates of each deer species by habitat areas derived from CORINE 2012 ( 37 ) ( Supplementary Table 3 ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We assumed those bags to represent 33% of the deer population. While bag numbers appear to offer a relatively crude method of assessing deer populations ( 35 , 36 ), they can provide good estimates of county-level populations ( 30 ) ( Supplementary Table 2 ). A variety of Sika density estimates were produced for each county by dividing population estimates of each deer species by habitat areas derived from CORINE 2012 ( 37 ) ( Supplementary Table 3 ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Estimates of Sika Deer ( Cervus nippon ) density for County Wicklow have risen from 7.8 animals/km 2 in 2000 to 31.4 animals/km 2 in 2018 (based on Sika Deer harvest or “bag” numbers published by the National Parks and Wildlife Service – NPWS– Supplementary Table 1 ). Although density calculations based on “bag” numbers are likely to be underestimates, as not all deer deaths (e.g., road deaths and natural causes) are reported in any given year, the technique has proved to be a good predictor of deer populations ( 30 ). The most recent estimate (31.4 animals/km 2 in 2018) for Sika in County Wicklow provides a regional density far greater than that of both Red Deer in an Austrian bTB hotspot ( 23 ) and that of state-wide estimates for White-tailed Deer in Michigan ( 26 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%