2007
DOI: 10.2114/jpa2.26.513
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Relationships between Body Fat Measured by DXA and Subcutaneous Adipose Tissue Thickness Measured by Lipometer in Adults

Abstract: The aim of this study was to examine the relationships between body fat measured by DXA and subcutaneous adipose tissue layers (SAT-layers) measured by LIPOMETER in adult males (nϭ28) and females (nϭ53). Body height and mass were measured and BMI was calculated (kg/m2). Measurements of the thicknesses of SAT-layers by LIPOMETER were performed at 15 original body sites. Body composition was measured using DXA. Total body fat % measured by DXA was highly dependent on the SAT-layers in the upper back and inner th… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The thickness of subcutaneous adipose tissue was measured at six sites to the nearest 0.1 mm using a LIP-OMETER Ò as described by Jürimäe et al (2007). In order to detect an increase in the thickness of the subcutaneous adipose tissue due to a clinically visible or palpable oedema in the face and limbs, the thickness of subcutaneous adipose tissue at the right side of the body at arcus zygomaticus, the middle of os metacarpale III, at the margo medialis tibiae, one handbreadth above malleolus medialis, directly at malleolus medialis and at os cuneiforme mediale was measured.…”
Section: Measurements and Calculationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The thickness of subcutaneous adipose tissue was measured at six sites to the nearest 0.1 mm using a LIP-OMETER Ò as described by Jürimäe et al (2007). In order to detect an increase in the thickness of the subcutaneous adipose tissue due to a clinically visible or palpable oedema in the face and limbs, the thickness of subcutaneous adipose tissue at the right side of the body at arcus zygomaticus, the middle of os metacarpale III, at the margo medialis tibiae, one handbreadth above malleolus medialis, directly at malleolus medialis and at os cuneiforme mediale was measured.…”
Section: Measurements and Calculationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, we assumed that measuring changes in limb volumes using plethysmography was an accurate method for the quantification of oedemas of the whole limb. The thickness of subcutaneous adipose tissue was measured using a LIPOMETER Ò as described by Jürimäe et al (2007). The LIPOMETER Ò is a non-invasive examination using infrared.…”
Section: Redistribution Of the Volumementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Calibration and evaluation were done using computed tomography, dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA), and bioelectrical impedance as the reference methods (21)(22)(23). SAT mass is calculated using the 15 SAT measuring points in consideration of height; visceral adipose tissue (VAT) mass is estimated; total fat mass is calculated as the sum of VAT mass and SAT mass; and total body fat (TBF) is estimated using SAT layers of triceps, back, lower abdomen, and front thigh representing different body regions (arms, legs, upper trunk, and lower trunk) as described previously (23,24). The lipometer system allows an excellent estimate of TBF when compared with conventional total body electrical conductivity measurements (24).…”
Section: Lipometrymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…But accurate measures consequently demand precise techniques and instruments including quality control of their variables. There is no doubt that widely applicable descriptive field methods based on the simple available techniques remain important and useful (Heymsfield et al, 2000;Jürimäe et al, 2007) as long as we are aware that indices such as BMI, H/W ratio, and %AT formulae offer prediction or approximation values only (Clarys et al, 1987(Clarys et al, , 2005Marfell-Jones et al, 2003). The advantage of CT and MRI over earlier methods is the direct visualization of images depicting BC tissues in 3-dimensions or as and a cross-sectional area.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%