2017
DOI: 10.3847/1538-4357/aa9119
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Relationships between Characteristics of the Line-of-sight Magnetic Field and Solar Flare Forecasts

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
22
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
1
22
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…They found that the best-performing discriminant functions, resulting from combining three or more photospheric magnetic parameters, make a slight improvement to distinguish between flaring and flare-quiet ARs. Recently, several machine-learning algorithms, such as support vector machine and multilayer perception, have been applied to various AR photospheric magnetic parameters in order to improve the performance of flare prediction (e.g., Ahmed et al, 2013;Bobra and Couvidat, 2015;Liu et al, 2017;Sadykov and Kosovichev, 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They found that the best-performing discriminant functions, resulting from combining three or more photospheric magnetic parameters, make a slight improvement to distinguish between flaring and flare-quiet ARs. Recently, several machine-learning algorithms, such as support vector machine and multilayer perception, have been applied to various AR photospheric magnetic parameters in order to improve the performance of flare prediction (e.g., Ahmed et al, 2013;Bobra and Couvidat, 2015;Liu et al, 2017;Sadykov and Kosovichev, 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although not widely used, the application of feature ranking methods for flare forecasting is definitely not a new idea. One of the most frequently used feature ranking techniques is the univariate F-score [4], [5], [27]. Another popular FSS methodology mentioned in the research papers employing a Random Forest algorithm [28] for flare forecasting are a selection of features based on Gini importance or the Mean Decrease Gini [29].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From weakest to strongest flares are classified logarithmically as A (10 −8 to 10 −7 W/m 2 ), B (10 −7 to 10 −6 W/m 2 ), C (10 −6 to 10 −5 W/m 2 ), M(10 −5 to 10 −4 W/m 2 ), and X (> 10 −4 W/m 2 ), meaning that an X-class flare is 10 times stronger than an M-class flare, and 100 times stronger than a C-class flare. Often in flare forecasting/prediction studies, the magnitude or the probability of occurrence of different classes of flares in an h-hour prediction window is of interest, e.g., [3]- [5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Одним из таких параметров является горизонтальный градиент вертикальной компоненты фотосферного магнитного поля . Наиболее успешная модель прогноза солнечных вспышек, опирающаяся на использование данного параметра, рассчитанного по магнитограммам HMI/SDO, была предложена в работе [3]. С точки зрения физики можно характеризовать как часть горизонтального электрического тока [4,5].…”
Section: вступлениеunclassified