2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2006.02.017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Relationships between community characteristics and municipal smoke-free bylaw status and strength

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
13
1

Year Published

2007
2007
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
13
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Bylaw restrictiveness was rated using a validated tool (Campbell et al . 2002, Nykiforuk et al . 2007) to capture change through bylaw amendments.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Bylaw restrictiveness was rated using a validated tool (Campbell et al . 2002, Nykiforuk et al . 2007) to capture change through bylaw amendments.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1999, Lachetti & Abernathy 2001, Skeer et al . 2004, Asbridge 2004, Nykiforuk et al . 2007), what remains missing is a purposeful consideration of the role of policy diffusion in bylaw uptake.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Gallet et al [16] found a reduced likelihood of adoption of clean indoor-air policy in states with higher tobacco consumption, lower per capita income, a greater metropolitan population, and higher levels of political conservativeness. Recent research from Canada found that community characteristics play a key role in the status and strength of municipal smokefree bylaws [17]. Although research has identified a specific need for rural promotion of SFA laws [18], there has been little support for the idea that this need is concentrated among tobacco farming localities [19].…”
Section: Efficacy Of Smokefree Air Policiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the relationship between smoking status and SFA policy support is not limited to a smoker vs. non-smoker dichotomy; it is also dependent on smoking levels and one's desire to quit [21], such that the most committed smokers have been found to be the least likely to support proposed smoking bans. Given the influence of public opinion on public policy [23], understanding the factors that influence public opinion is crucial for predicting and promoting SFA policy [17].…”
Section: Support For Smokefree Air Policiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Municipal governments, in this regard, have been crucial. In terms of the 'letter of the law,' the relative strength (or severity) of bylaws on smoking has varied, largely in relation to community characteristics suggesting social acceptability (Nykiforuk et al 2007). In turn, suggestions about social acceptability have hinged on actors' capacity to mobilize resources (Young, Borland and Coghill 2010).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%