1994
DOI: 10.1016/0146-6380(94)90086-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Relationships between data from Rock-Eval pyrolysis and proximate, ultimate, petrographic, and physical analyses of 142 diverse U.S. coal samples

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
29
0
4

Year Published

1997
1997
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
1
29
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Although the Rock-Eval 6 instrument has an oxidation temperature of 850°C, incomplete combustion of the refractory coal constituents may lead to too low TOC determinations; this problem is overcome with the CS-200 analyser which has an about twice as high oxidation temperature. The interpretation and pitfalls of Rock-Eval data have among others been discussed by Bordenave et al (1993), Bostick and Daws (1994), Peters (1986) and Sykes and Snowdon (2002). Pitfalls may include interference by the mineral matrix, underestimation of the S 2 signal, influence by retained petroleum, and overloading of the detector.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Although the Rock-Eval 6 instrument has an oxidation temperature of 850°C, incomplete combustion of the refractory coal constituents may lead to too low TOC determinations; this problem is overcome with the CS-200 analyser which has an about twice as high oxidation temperature. The interpretation and pitfalls of Rock-Eval data have among others been discussed by Bordenave et al (1993), Bostick and Daws (1994), Peters (1986) and Sykes and Snowdon (2002). Pitfalls may include interference by the mineral matrix, underestimation of the S 2 signal, influence by retained petroleum, and overloading of the detector.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Jasper et al, 2009). Comparison of Rock-Eval parameters with a variety of other coal rank parameters has been published by Bostick and Daws (1994).…”
Section: Nevertheless T Max Values In Combination With Hydrogen Indementioning
confidence: 99%
“…These S 1 values are significantly higher than those obtained by Newman et al (1994,1997: 4 3 mg HC/g rock), and highlight the influence of different Rock-Eval techniques on pyrolysis yields. S 1 s greater than 10 mg HC/g rock in coals from the North Sea and the Mahakam Delta (Durand and Paratte, in Bostick and Daws, 1994) are thought to be indicative of their prolific oil-generating capabilities. In general, coals give lower S 1 peaks than those typically found for petroleum source rocks (Verheyen et al, 1984), and these values become markedly lower at vitrinite reflectances > 1 % (Bostick and Daws, 1994).…”
Section: Rock-eva1 Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%