Relationships between Density and per Capita Municipal Spending in the United States

Abstract

The objective of this research is to determine the relationship between land use, particularly density, and per capita spending levels in cities across the United States. A model was developed using data from the U.S. Census Bureau’s Annual Survey of State and Local Government Finances to estimate the impacts of population-weighted density and other factors on per capita municipal spending. This study focused on municipal spending for eight categories that theoretically could be influenced by land use development: fire protection, streets and highways, libraries, parks and recreation, police, sewer, solid waste management, and water. Density was found to be negatively associated with per capita municipal expenditures for the following cost categories: operational costs for fire protection, streets and highways, parks and recreation, sewer, solid waste management, and water; construction costs for streets and highways, parks and recreation, sewer, and water; and land and existing facility costs for police, sewer, and water. Results were insignificant for other cost categories, and a positive relationship was found for police operations costs. In general, results support the conclusion that increased density is associated with reduced per capita municipal spending for several cost categories.

Audit fee determinants in small municipalities: Further evidence from Connecticut small towns

“…An interesting aspect of this study can be seen in the illustrative power of looking at municipal audit spending on a per capita basis as government spending is often viewed as a function of how many people receive a service and how much the service costs taxpayers (Gordon & Iselin, 2017). Since municipalities pay for audit services from tax revenues collected, burdening the entire population with this expenditure, the authors found it compelling to scrutinise audit fees on a basis of cost per resident as seen in peer‐reviewed research on government expenditures (Holcombe & Williams, 2008; Mattson, 2021).…”

Defining the Organization of Municipal Solid Waste Management Based on Production Costs

“…Other studies focus on the cost structures of waste management [10], the relation with exogenous factors such as population density [25], the need to develop strategies to achieve sustainability targets [26], compliance with environmental legislation and costs [27], and zero waste management [28]. Similar approaches have been developed for other local environmental services, such as water, where studies suggest substantial cost benefits from the joint production of treated quality water [29] and potential benefits of appropriate scale and scope economies considering vertical and horizontal configurations of water industries [30].…”

Gastos públicos e tamanho ótimo dos municípios: Análise do Rio Grande do Sul usando um painel espacial dinâmico

“…Por outro lado, o aumento da população e de sua densidade requer investimentos públicos de capital em outros serviços, por exemplo estrutura de deslocamento (transporte público adequado e vias bem sinalizadas), recolhimento de lixo e segurança pública. (Mattson, 2021) encontra que a densidade populacional corrobora a redução de custos em áreas essenciais, como: rodovias, água e esgoto.…”