1996
DOI: 10.1094/pd-80-0726
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Relationships Between Disease Reactions under Controlled Conditions and Severity of Wheat Bacterial Streak in the Field

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
10
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Effect of relative maturity on expression of BLS resistance was also observed in previous studies (12,19). Effect of relative maturity on expression of BLS resistance was also observed in previous studies (12,19).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 75%
“…Effect of relative maturity on expression of BLS resistance was also observed in previous studies (12,19). Effect of relative maturity on expression of BLS resistance was also observed in previous studies (12,19).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 75%
“…To the soil in each container, 2.5 g of multicote slow release commercial fertilizer (14–14–16 N–P–K; Sungro Horticulture Distribution Inc.) was applied at the time of planting. Wheat breeding line ND495 (Adhikari et al, 2009) and winter wheat cultivar Magnum (Milus et al, 1996) served as susceptible and resistant controls, respectively. Wheat accessions were arranged in a randomized complete block design (RCBD) with three replications.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the previous studies, spring wheat cultivars Pavon 76, Mochis T88, Nanjing 8331, and Thombird were found to be resistant to BLS in Mexico (8,10), while winter wheat cultivars Magnum, Bayles, Sawyer, and Terral 101 showed resistance to BLS in the United States (17). Despite efforts made in the past decade to evaluate and characterize resistance to BLS, the available pool of BLS-resistant wheat appears to be inadequate, and more materials should be evaluated to identify additional sources of resistance to BLS for use in wheat breeding programs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Disease scores of 0 to 2 (or less than 10% water-soaking within the infiltrated areas) were considered resistant (R) (26), and 2.1 to 6 (or greater than 10% water-soaking) were regarded as susceptible (S) reactions. Wheat breeding line ND495 (1) and cultivar Magnum (17) served as susceptible (positive control) and resistant (negative control) check, respectively.…”
Section: Iviaterials and Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%