Relationships between each category of 25‐item frailty risk assessment (<scp>K</scp>ihon <scp>C</scp>hecklist) and newly certified older adults under <scp>L</scp>ong‐<scp>T</scp>erm <scp>C</scp>are <scp>I</scp>nsurance: A 24‐month follow‐up study in a rural community in <scp>J</scp>apan

Fukutomi, Eriko; Okumiya, Kiyohito; Wada, Taizo; Sakamoto, Ryota; Ishimoto, Yasuko; Kimura, Yumi; Chen, Wenling; Imai, Hissei; Kasahara, Yoriko; Fujisawa, Michiko; Otsuka, Kuniaki; Matsubayashi, Kozo

doi:10.1111/ggi.12360

Cited by 122 publications

(133 citation statements)

References 21 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

132

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…We identified that the majority of authors maintained the Japanese term "Kihon Checklist" 11,15,17,20,21 or used similar terms, "Kihon-Checklist" 22 and "Kihon Check Lists." 12 In addition, some authors translated and denominated the checklist as "Basic checklist for frailty"; 23 "Basic questionnaire" and "basic checklist";…”

Section: Kcl Terminologymentioning

confidence: 99%

“…1,10 Furthermore, the next domain includes questions six to ten and has been named "physical strength domain," 11,15,20 "walking status domain," 14,23 "physical domain," 17 "motor function domain,"…”

Section: Kcl Terminologymentioning

confidence: 99%

“…each category is rated on a pass (0)/fail (1) basis, and the sum of all indices ranges from 0 (no frailty) to 25 (severe frailty); a higher score indicates worse functioning. [14][15][16] The time required for older adults to answer the KCL is approximately 15 min. 17 The KCL showed good concurrent validity with the Fried's criteria for evaluating frailty; specifically, it had a sensitivity of 60% and a specificity of 86.4%.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…24 Questions 11 and 12 represent the "nutritional status domain" 11,14,15,23,25 or the "nutrition domain." 1,10,12,17,20 Questions 13-15 correspond to the "oral function domain," 1,[10][11][12]15,23,25 "eating domain" 17,20 or "dysphagia domain." 14 Questions 16 and 17 capture the "houseboundness domain," 11,15 "socialization domain," 17,20 "staying indoors domain," 23 "withdrawing into one's shell domain" 12 or "seclusion domain."…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

“…1,10,12,17,20 Questions 13-15 correspond to the "oral function domain," 1,[10][11][12]15,23,25 "eating domain" 17,20 or "dysphagia domain." 14 Questions 16 and 17 capture the "houseboundness domain," 11,15 "socialization domain," 17,20 "staying indoors domain," 23 "withdrawing into one's shell domain" 12 or "seclusion domain." 1,10 Questions 18-20 constitute the "cognitive function domain," 15,25 "memory domain," 17,20 "cognitive status domain,"…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

See 4 more Smart Citations

Systematic review of the Kihon Checklist: Is it a reliable assessment of frailty?

Sampaio

Yamada

et al. 2016

Geriatrics Gerontology Int

217

197

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Aim: To investigate whether the Kihon Checklist (KCL) can predict frailty and disability.Methods: The studies analyzed for the present review were retrieved by searching electronic databases and other sources using the keywords "Kihon Checklist" and "Basic Checklist." The articles were restricted to those written in English and published in health sciences journals from the year 2006 until the end of April 2015. To be included in the full analysis, the study had to be primary research and use the KCL as a dependent or independent variable.Results: A total of 62 articles were identified in the initial search, and after screening, 13 articles were included in this review. The KCL was found to be closely correlated with validated assessments of frailty phenotypes. The complete version of the KCL and specific domains have been used as research outcomes to verify frailty in cross-sectional and longitudinal studies. KCL domains were applied to evaluate different outcomes, such as depressive mood, functional disability and instrumental activities of daily living limitations. Conclusions:The KCL is a reliable tool for predicting general frailty and frailty aspects in older adults. The KCL was shown to be adequate for cross-cultural studies and to be suitable for addressing frailty demands among elderly in multiple cohorts. The KCL is a short questionnaire, which makes its administration by health promoters easy; thus, it has been used to evaluate the effectiveness of frailty interventions. We strongly recommend use of the KCL in community and clinical practice to assess frailty status. Geriatr Gerontol Int 2016; 16: 893-902.

show abstract

Section: Kcl Terminologymentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Kcl Terminologymentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

mentioning

confidence: 99%

mentioning

confidence: 99%

See 3 more Smart Citations

Systematic review of the Kihon Checklist: Is it a reliable assessment of frailty?

Sampaio

Yamada

et al. 2016

Geriatrics Gerontology Int

217

197

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Improvement of physical and oral function in community‐dwelling older people after a 3‐month long‐term care prevention program including physical exercise, oral health instruction, and nutritional guidance

Iwao

Shigeishi

Takahashi³

et al. 2019

Clinical & Exp Dental Res

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

ObjectiveThere is limited evidence about the most appropriate way to improve physical and oral function in older people. The aim of this study was to clarify the effectiveness of a long‐term care prevention program combining physical exercise, oral health instruction, and nutritional guidance among community‐dwelling older people.Materials and methodsWe included 43 older people aged at least 65 years (seven men and 23 women; mean age 75.3 years) in Bungotakada City, Japan. The 3‐month program involved a weekly intervention. Physical and oral function was investigated on the first day of the program (i.e., baseline) and at the end of the program (i.e., after 3 months). Physical function was examined using measures such as handgrip strength, timed up‐and‐go test, and one‐leg standing time with eyes open. An oral diadochokinesis test was used to assess oral function.ResultsMean maximum handgrip strength increased significantly in older people aged ≤74 years (younger participants) and those aged ≥75 years (older participants) after 3 months compared with the baseline. The timed up‐and‐go test duration was significantly lower in older participants after the program. Repetition of the monosyllables pa and ka and the repetitive saliva swallowing test was significantly improved in both groups. The dysphagia risk assessment for the community‐dwelling elderly score was significantly lower in younger participants after 3 months.ConclusionParticipation in a 3‐month program combining physical exercise, oral health instruction, and nutritional guidance may contribute to improvement or maintenance of oral and physical function in older people.

show abstract

The association between social participation and cognitive function in community-dwelling older populations: Japan Gerontological Evaluation Study at Taisetsu community Hokkaido

Sakamoto

Ukawa

Okada

et al. 2016

Int J Geriatr Psychiatry

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Relationships between each category of 25‐item frailty risk assessment (Kihon Checklist) and newly certified older adults under Long‐Term Care Insurance: A 24‐month follow‐up study in a rural community in Japan

Abstract: The physical strength category in men was the only significant predictor of the incidence of newly certified cases by LTCI. Further studies are required to improve the assessment item of cognitive function in KCL under LTCI.

Cited by 122 publications

References 21 publications

Systematic review of the Kihon Checklist: Is it a reliable assessment of frailty?

Systematic review of the Kihon Checklist: Is it a reliable assessment of frailty?

Improvement of physical and oral function in community‐dwelling older people after a 3‐month long‐term care prevention program including physical exercise, oral health instruction, and nutritional guidance

The association between social participation and cognitive function in community-dwelling older populations: Japan Gerontological Evaluation Study at Taisetsu community Hokkaido

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About