2018
DOI: 10.18857/jkpt.2018.30.3.90
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Relationships between Gross Motor Capacity and Neuromusculoskeletal Function in Children with Cerebral Palsy after Short-Term Intensive Therapy

Abstract: Purpose: To investigate the relationship between gross motor capacity and neuromuscular function in children with cerebral palsy (CP) through a short-term intensive intervention. Methods: Twenty-four children younger than 6 years of age (17 boys, 7 girls, mean age± standard deviation, 42.71±14.43 months) who were diagnosed with CP underwent short-term intensive treatment for 8 weeks. An evaluation of gross motor function capacity using the gross motor function measure (GMFM-66 and GMFM-88) was performed to mea… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

1
0
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 39 publications
1
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Percentage of spastic diplegia were 33.3% and 30.0% and percentage of spastic quadriplegia were 46.6% and 43.3% in group A and group B respectively. Similar study conducted by Kim (2018) included 24 study participants (17 boys, 7 girls, average age, 42.71 months) receiving intensive short-term treatment, 14 were diagnosed with CP spastic quadriplegia and 10 with spastic diplegia 12. In present study, 9 (15.0%) were classified at level I, 26.6% were classified at level II, 30.0% in 1 st group.…”
supporting
confidence: 71%
“…Percentage of spastic diplegia were 33.3% and 30.0% and percentage of spastic quadriplegia were 46.6% and 43.3% in group A and group B respectively. Similar study conducted by Kim (2018) included 24 study participants (17 boys, 7 girls, average age, 42.71 months) receiving intensive short-term treatment, 14 were diagnosed with CP spastic quadriplegia and 10 with spastic diplegia 12. In present study, 9 (15.0%) were classified at level I, 26.6% were classified at level II, 30.0% in 1 st group.…”
supporting
confidence: 71%