2015
DOI: 10.1007/s10681-015-1353-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Relationships between heterosis, genetic distances and specific combining ability among CIMMYT and Zimbabwe developed maize inbred lines under stress and optimal conditions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

6
20
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
6
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, Ceballos et al (2016) observed weak associations between the GD and SCA effects, which presented r 2 values ranging from 0.00 to 0.28. Ndhlela et al (2015) and Dreisigacker et al (2005) found no explicit correlation between GD and heterosis. Cress (1966) proposed that the extent of GD between parents is necessary for significant heterosis but is not sufficient to guarantee it.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…However, Ceballos et al (2016) observed weak associations between the GD and SCA effects, which presented r 2 values ranging from 0.00 to 0.28. Ndhlela et al (2015) and Dreisigacker et al (2005) found no explicit correlation between GD and heterosis. Cress (1966) proposed that the extent of GD between parents is necessary for significant heterosis but is not sufficient to guarantee it.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…A positive association has been reported between molecular marker-based GD and hybrid performance in pearl millet [20], while few studies have indicated a negative relationship [17,21]. Similarly, some studies found a positive relationship between molecular marker based genetic diversity and heterosis in other crops, like in maize [22,23], in rice [24,25] and in sunflower [26], while others reported no relationship between GD and heterosis in maize [27,28], in rice [29,30] and in sunflower [31]. Hence, the present study was designed to investigate genetic diversity in forage type hybrid parents based on both morphological traits and also using two different molecular marker systems (SSRs and GBS-identified SNPs markers), to reveal the relationship between marker based genetic diversity and heterosis for forage traits.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The female inbred lines, RML0014 and RML0017, had high, positive and significant GCAs for grain yield and positive and significant GCA for silking (Table 7), implying that they increase grain yield in crosses and at the same time increase silking as well. Therefore, they have are useful for improving grain yield in crosses, but they have an undesirable effect of increasing silking (Hallauer et al, 2010, Ndhlela et al, 2015. Their use will depend primarily on the targeted trait, namely grain versus silking.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Their use will depend primarily on the targeted trait, namely grain versus silking. The male inbred line, RML0010, had high GCA for grain yield and non-significant GCA for silking, hence, it had the necessary propriety for improving grain yield in the crosses and not affecting silking (Ndhlela et al, 2015).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation