2021
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0259071
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Relationships between in vivo surface and ex vivo electrical impedance myography measurements in three different neuromuscular disorder mouse models

Abstract: Electrical impedance myography (EIM) using surface techniques has shown promise as a means of diagnosing and tracking disorders affecting muscle and assessing treatment efficacy. However, the relationship between such surface-obtained impedance values and pure muscle impedance values has not been established. Here we studied three groups of diseased and wild-type (WT) animals, including a Duchenne muscular dystrophy model (the D2-mdx mouse), an amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) model (the SOD1 G93A mouse), a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In fact, the data from the very lowest frequencies obtained are impressively artifact-free. The strong correlation to needle data across much of the frequency range supports this and follows what was previously reported in mice ex vivo data [58]. Indeed, the needle measurement taken immediately after a surface measurement was taken showed how surface EIM correlated with homologous needle EIM parameters, especially at lower frequencies (Figure 2).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…In fact, the data from the very lowest frequencies obtained are impressively artifact-free. The strong correlation to needle data across much of the frequency range supports this and follows what was previously reported in mice ex vivo data [58]. Indeed, the needle measurement taken immediately after a surface measurement was taken showed how surface EIM correlated with homologous needle EIM parameters, especially at lower frequencies (Figure 2).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…The bioimpedance measurement system consists of a Solartron 1260 impedance analyzer and a Solartron 1294 interface (Solartron Analytical, Farnborough, United Kingdom), which can operate at the frequency range from 10 Hz to 1 MHz with the accuracy of better than 0.01%. In this study, the current of 1 mA at 50 kHz was applied because the characteristic frequency of impedance property of muscle tissue was around 50 kHz ( Bartels et al, 2015 ; Pandeya et al, 2021 ). In order to reduce the effect of electrode-skin contact impedance, the four electrode strategy was adopted ( Yang et al, 2016 , 2017b ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Considering that the electrode-skin contact impedance was much larger than the tissues impedance at low frequencies (below 1 kHz) (Rosell et al, 1988;Yang et al, 2017a), their measurement results included not only the tissue impedance between measuring electrodes, but also the electrode-skin contact impedance. To effectively eliminate the influence of electrode-skin contact impedance on the measurement results, we adopted the four-electrode approach to perform impedance measurement in this study (Bartels et al, 2015;Pandeya et al, 2021). The difference of lumbar muscle impedance for different LBP scales could be associated with the physiological structure of muscle tissue.…”
Section: Analysis Of Sensitivity Of Lumbar Muscle Impedance To Low Ba...mentioning
confidence: 99%