2005
DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2005.01643.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Relationships Between Intergroup Contact and Prejudice Among Minority and Majority Status Groups

Abstract: Considerable research has shown that greater intergroup contact corresponds with lower intergroup prejudice, yet little is known regarding how the relationships between contact and prejudice may vary for members of minority and majority status groups. The present research examined differences in contact-prejudice relationships among members of minority and majority status groups, using data from a larger meta-analytic study of the effects of intergroup contact. Results indicate that the relationships between c… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

71
677
16
23

Year Published

2007
2007
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5
4
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 698 publications
(787 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
71
677
16
23
Order By: Relevance
“…However, Pettigrew and Tropp (2006) directly challenge researchers to further search for mediators of contact effects, because discovering the processes involved in attitude change via intergroup contact needs further exploration. Tropp and Pettigrew (2005) already stated that concerns about how the outgroup perceive the ingroup affects how people respond to intergroup contact. For example, while majority status members are concerned about being considered prejudiced, minority status members are concerned about being the target of prejudice.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, Pettigrew and Tropp (2006) directly challenge researchers to further search for mediators of contact effects, because discovering the processes involved in attitude change via intergroup contact needs further exploration. Tropp and Pettigrew (2005) already stated that concerns about how the outgroup perceive the ingroup affects how people respond to intergroup contact. For example, while majority status members are concerned about being considered prejudiced, minority status members are concerned about being the target of prejudice.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As predicted, having more extended contact with members of the other minority group was associated with less prejudice towards this First, it may be due to status differences between the groups (Bikmen, 2011; see also Tropp & Pettigrew, 2005): Members of a disadvantaged group are likely to feel they are targets of prejudice in direct contact situations and develop negative expectations. In Finland, Russians have a significantly lower social status and are less accepted by majority Finns than Estonians (Jaakkola, 2005(Jaakkola, , 2009 To recap, the findings of Study 2 demonstrate the beneficial role of extended contact on outgroup prejudice and social distance enabled by the affective and cognitive mechanisms.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 62%
“…Así, dicho efecto es mayor en los grupos mayoritarios que en los minoritarios (Tropp y Pettigrew, 2005b). Los escasos estudios realizados con grupos minoritarios muestran que la interacción con el exogrupo plantea retos distintos en cada caso: mientras que los miembros del grupo mayoritario tienden a estar más atentos a sus propios prejuicios para tratar de controlarlos, los del grupo minoritario prestan más atención a la detección de actitudes prejuiciosas en aquellos (Shelton, 2003).…”
Section: Contacto Y Actitudes Intergrupalesunclassified