2020
DOI: 10.1002/rcm.8970
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Relationships between leaf δ15N and leaf metallic nutrients

Abstract: Rationale Nitrogen (N) isotopic ratios (δ15N values) of plants are primarily determined by the δ15N values of their N sources. Metallic nutrients affect plant N uptake. However, there is little knowledge of the relationships between leaf δ15N values and leaf metallic nutrients. The δ15N values are often lower in soil nitrate (NO3−) than in ammonium (NH4+) due to large isotopic fractionation during nitrification. Plants acquire more NO3− than NH4+ when accumulating high potassium (K), calcium (Ca) and magnesium… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 47 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the limitation of plant nutrients does not rule out the dilution effects due to the specific Karst environment. For example, K, Ca, and Mg contents can influence the NO 3 − and NH 4 + uptake of plants ( Chen et al, 2021 ) and the antagonistic interaction between K and Ca ( Haghshenas, Arshad & Nazarideljou, 2018 ). Further study should consider using the isotope tracing method to reveal the specific sources of elements and determine the influence of elements on each other.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the limitation of plant nutrients does not rule out the dilution effects due to the specific Karst environment. For example, K, Ca, and Mg contents can influence the NO 3 − and NH 4 + uptake of plants ( Chen et al, 2021 ) and the antagonistic interaction between K and Ca ( Haghshenas, Arshad & Nazarideljou, 2018 ). Further study should consider using the isotope tracing method to reveal the specific sources of elements and determine the influence of elements on each other.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%