2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.clim.2015.06.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Relationships between major epitopes of the IA-2 autoantigen in Type 1 diabetes: Implications for determinant spreading

Abstract: Diversification of autoimmunity to islet autoantigens is critical for progression to Type 1 diabetes. B-cells participate in diversification by modifying antigen processing, thereby influencing which peptides are presented to T-cells. In Type 1 diabetes, JM antibodies are associated with T-cell responses to PTP domain peptides. We investigated whether this is the consequence of close structural alignment of JM and PTP domain determinants on IA-2. Fab fragments of IA-2 antibodies with epitopes mapped to the JM … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

3
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although canonical immune responses to IA-2ic are considered to be immunodominant (2931), we found autoantibody and T-cell responses specifically directed to IA-2ec in individuals with or without antibodies directed to IA-2ic. Our results reinforce the notion that long-lived autoantibody responses in the natural history of autoimmune disorders, such as type 1 diabetes, are generally regarded to be polyclonal and yet not restricted to one portion of a given self-antigen (3235).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 58%
“…Although canonical immune responses to IA-2ic are considered to be immunodominant (2931), we found autoantibody and T-cell responses specifically directed to IA-2ec in individuals with or without antibodies directed to IA-2ic. Our results reinforce the notion that long-lived autoantibody responses in the natural history of autoimmune disorders, such as type 1 diabetes, are generally regarded to be polyclonal and yet not restricted to one portion of a given self-antigen (3235).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 58%
“…We cannot exclude that the low frequency of islet antigen reactive B cells detected in our study was the consequence of sequence artefacts introduced during the cloning that affected the CDR3-binding region of the B cell receptors (BCRs). Nevertheless, the study produced two antibodies against IA-2, one from a lymph node and one from peripheral blood, both to the PTP region, with binding profiles similar to each other and to other type 1 diabetes-derived autoantibodies [9]. This epitope, therefore, is a common target of autoreactive B cells in type 1 diabetes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…IA-2 epitope mapping of the human antibodies (hAb) was performed using constructs containing cytoplasmic IA-2 (amino acid 605-979), juxtamembrane (JM; 605-693), protein tyrosine phosphatase (PTP; 643-979) or central IA-2 PTP (643-937) regions, and alaninesubstituted mutants of these, using radiobinding assays as previously described [9]. Inhibition by >50% was taken as evidence that amino acid substitution affected binding.…”
Section: Antibody Screeningmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This finding suggests either that alanine substitution of the lysine at residue 609 disturbs the conformation of the 625–627 region, for example by disrupting ionic interactions, or that the JM region is folded such that residue 609 is brought in close proximity to the 625–627 region and participates directly in antibody binding. Mouse monoclonal antibodies to the IA-2 JM domain having similar binding characteristics to those seen in human type 1 diabetes [ 14 , 15 ], also displayed sensitivity to amino acid substitutions within noncontiguous regions of the JM domain [ 16 ]. Thus, four different mouse monoclonal antibodies to the IA-2 JM domain were all inhibited by alanine substitutions in the cluster 4 amino acids 615, 635 and 636, with each antibody being also affected by different amino acid substitutions elsewhere in the JM domain, similar to the observations with the patient sera.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%