Improved Crop Quality by Nutrient Management
DOI: 10.1007/978-0-585-37449-9_34
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Relationships between nutrition of Ayvalık olive variety and its oil quality

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(3 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…On the contrary, there was a decrease in Fe concentration as seen in Figure 6. Seferoğlu [32] found the Fe concentrations in Ayvalık-type olive in Ayvalık region to be between 55-115 mg kg -1 , and between 60-140 mg kg -1 in Edremit region. Soyergin et al [36] reported the Fe concentration of Gemlik-type olive to be 88-280 mg kg -1 .…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…On the contrary, there was a decrease in Fe concentration as seen in Figure 6. Seferoğlu [32] found the Fe concentrations in Ayvalık-type olive in Ayvalık region to be between 55-115 mg kg -1 , and between 60-140 mg kg -1 in Edremit region. Soyergin et al [36] reported the Fe concentration of Gemlik-type olive to be 88-280 mg kg -1 .…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Soyergin [31] reported that Ca concentration was between 1.26-2.94% in Gemlik-type olive. Seferoğlu [32] conducted a study on two different regions and found that leaf Ca concentrations were 1.10-1.80% in Ayvalık region, while 1.00-1.20% in Edremit region. The study of Reuter and Robinson [20] reported the optimum Ca concentrations of olive trees as >%1.0.…”
Section: Effect Of Humic Acid On Leaf Ca Concentrationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation