1978
DOI: 10.1080/01619567809538207
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Relationships between perceived attributes of innovations and their subsequent adoption

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

1984
1984
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Included are efforts carried out under such headings as educational reform (Sizer, 1984), school renewal (Bassin, Gross, and Jordan, 1979), educational innovation (Allan and Wolf, 1978), and school improvement (Huberman and Miles, 1984). So too we are confronted with a growing number of concepts relating to change in educational settings.…”
Section: School Change At the Building Levelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Included are efforts carried out under such headings as educational reform (Sizer, 1984), school renewal (Bassin, Gross, and Jordan, 1979), educational innovation (Allan and Wolf, 1978), and school improvement (Huberman and Miles, 1984). So too we are confronted with a growing number of concepts relating to change in educational settings.…”
Section: School Change At the Building Levelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Perceived compatibility is an attribute of innovations that affects the adoption and diffusion of an innovation (Allan & Wolf 1978); high levels of perceived compatibility "with a previously introduced idea" (Rogers 2003: 244) can lead to misadoption. The perceived compatibility between an innovation and the "previously introduced idea" (Rogers 2003: 244) can cause difficulties and unforeseen challenges with implementation and use of the innovation as well as changes to the organization itself (Rogers 2003).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Rogers (2003) identifies the perceived attributes of innovations which comprised of relative advantages, compatibility, complexity, trialability, and observability. It has been proved that those attributes have significant relationships with the adoption of technologies (Allan and Wolf, 1978;Rogers, 2003). This model has been used widely by researchers and practitioners to assess the rate of adoption (Yap and Souder, 1993;Pankratz et al, 2002).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%