Relationships between psychosocial well-being and leisure time physical activity among 160.000 young Finnish men: a cross-sectional study during 2015–2021

Abstract

Evidence on the relationship between psychosocial well-being and physical activity (PA) is insufficient, especially in young adults between 18 and 29 years. Identifying protective factors for psychosocial well-being as well as factors that may promote PA behaviour in this specific age group is crucial.The aim of the present study was to explore the association between self-reported leisure time physical activity (LTPA) and a number of measures of psychosocial well-being in a large sample of Finnish young men. The sample used for this study is based on registers of the Finnish Defence Forces and consist of questionnaire-based data collected from 159,776 young healthy men (18–29 years, mean age 19 years) who started their military service during the period from 2015 to 2021. Sum scores were calculated for self-esteem and prosocial behaviour. Physical activity, number of friends and the relationship with the parents were each measured with a single question. Unadjusted and adjusted (education, financial situation of the family, family structure) logistic regression models were calculated.A multinominal logistic regression analysis showed that a higher level of LTPA was associated with a higher level of both prosocial behaviour (OR 6.12, 95% CI 5.88–6.36) and self-esteem (OR 4.41 95% CI 4.28–4.54). Further, LTPA had a positive relationship with good social relations, both with peers and parents. The odds ratio for participation in any LTPA weekly was higher (OR 2.74; CI 2.27–3.20) among those who had a close and trustworthy relationship with their parents compared to those men with more challenging relationships with their parents (OR 1.77; CI 1.46–2.14). An inactive lifestyle (PA less than once a week) seemed to be most common among men with no friends. About one third (31%) of men with no friends reported to engage in LTPA less than once a week, while only 10% of men with very many good friends reported to engage in similarly inactive LTPA behaviour.LTPA seems to be positively associated with self-esteem, prosocial behaviour and good social relations among young adult men. Actions aimed at promoting LTPA may have a positive impact on psychosocial well-being among young men, or vice versa. The relationship between PA and psychosocial well-being is complex and interrelated.

Uncovering the links between physical activity and prosocial behaviour: A functional near-infrared spectroscopy hyperscanning study on brain connectivity and synchrony

“…The present findings offer insights into the mixed results of previous studies on the association between physical activity and prosocial behaviour. [21][22][23][24][25][26] Our study revealed a positive correlation between physical activity and reciprocity as well as a negative correlation with trust. The results of reciprocity were in accordance with our a priori hypothesis, whereas those of trust were not.…”

“…Existing evidence on the relationship between physical activity and prosocial behaviour suggest both positive [21][22][23] and null or negligible associations. [24][25][26] Consequently, there is a lack of clear evidence showing the effect of physical activity on human prosocial behaviour.…”

The Importance of Physical Activity in Preventing Fatigue and Burnout in Healthcare Workers

“…A recent study assessed the importance of maintaining a healthy lifestyle such as participating in physical activity, eating a healthy diet, etc., in reducing obesity and improving health conditions [ 4 ]. Individuals who maintain regular physical activity are found to have sustained happiness, self-esteem, and optimism as compared to those who do not exercise regularly [ 5 ]. Physical activity thus helps to build confidence, is seen as therapeutic intervention, and can certainly improve one’s health and well-being [ 6 ].…”

Parental Influence on Child Social and Emotional Functioning

“…Research focused on the adolescent population emphasizes a model of positive development, which seeks to identify, understand, and strengthen the factors that increase the capacity of adolescents to maintain and improve their health and wellbeing. While health is understood from the combination of social, physical, and mental domains (World Health Organization [WHO], 2006), the concept of wellbeing broadens its hedonic meaning to eudaimonic (Appelqvist-Schmidlechner et al, 2023;Maurer et al, 2023), in that it emphasizes the potential of the person to engage and fulfill oneself, as well as develop and find meaning in one's life (Ryan and Deci, 2001). Consequently, the approach centered on the vision of a passive adolescent with deficiencies or incapacities who needs protection from risk 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1258748 behaviors (Lerner et al, 2009), has been overtaken by one that considers the adolescent as an active agent and values his or her potential (Seligman and Csikszentmihalyi, 2000;Gagné and Vansteenkiste, 2013).…”