1979
DOI: 10.1104/pp.64.5.770
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Relationships between Root System Water Transport Properties and Plant Size in Phaseolus

Abstract: Root system hydraulic conductivity (Lp) (6-8, 13, 14), are relatively scarce and mostly confined to small systems and terminal root segments, which cannot be expected to reflect average conditions for the whole system. We know of no attempt to determine the relationship between the average Lp and the root system size or shoot leaf area.Our purpose here is to establish the broad outline of this relationship in bean plants and to compare the magnitude of our data with field data obtained by others. MATERIALS … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
30
0
3

Year Published

1982
1982
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
2

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 86 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
6
30
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Determination of these coefficients based on the freezing point depressions of the exudates yielded the same results so that the use of conductivity as a measure of the osmotic concentration appears to be justified in this instance. The coefficients presented thus far serve to demonstrate that the systems were behaving well and were comparable to those previously described (1,2).…”
supporting
confidence: 53%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Determination of these coefficients based on the freezing point depressions of the exudates yielded the same results so that the use of conductivity as a measure of the osmotic concentration appears to be justified in this instance. The coefficients presented thus far serve to demonstrate that the systems were behaving well and were comparable to those previously described (1,2).…”
supporting
confidence: 53%
“…= C"(l -a)J. + wAnl + J,* (2) J, is the volume flux density in cm' cm-2 s-', Lp the hydraulic conductance in cm3 cm-2 s' bar-', AP and AlI the hydrostatic and osmotic pressure differences across the root in bars, a the osmotic efficiency or reflection coefficient, J., the solute flux density in mole cm-2 s-', C the concentration in mole cm-3, the superscripts o and i refer to the outside and inside of the root respectively, w the coefficient of solute mobility in mole cm-2 S-' bar-', R the universal gas constant in cm3 bar mol-' K<', T the absolute temperature in K, and J. * the active solute transport rate in mole cm-2 s-'.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Following the development (Eqs. [2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11] in the same fashion as before leads to Fig. 9).…”
Section: )mentioning
confidence: 87%
“…According to Fiscus and Markhart (1979), the system size seems to be the dominant and root permeability the minor factor. Also age of the root seems relatively unimportant for the nutrient uptake (Clarkson and Hanson 1980).…”
Section: Efficiency Of Root Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%