1963
DOI: 10.1037/h0044740
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Relationships between teacher needs and teacher behavior in the classroom.

Abstract: 2 samples of elementary school teachers (N = 77 and 41) were studied with respect to consistencies between classroom behavior and "needs" as measured by a paper-and-pendl questionnaire. The paper-and-pencil device provided scores on Achievement, Affiliation, Recognition, and Control needs. Behavioral data consisted of observations recorded as ratings and also as Q sorts and an analysis of verbal statements made by the teachers. The principal findings were: (a) significant positive relationships among the vario… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1963
1963
1980
1980

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, a "friendly, warm, understanding, sensitive, sincere, empathic, rapport-maintaining" sort of style pattern was reported by Bowers, Davis, and Bowers (1962), Hodgson and Horst (1959), Medley (1962), Medley and Mitzel (1959), , Ryans (1960a), and Wallen and others (1963) as well as by other investigators during recent years. In the reviewer's opinion, these should be considered primarily as underlying characteristics, or source traits, rather than teacher behaviors.…”
Section: Internal Inputs Contributing To Instructor Behaviormentioning
confidence: 75%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…For example, a "friendly, warm, understanding, sensitive, sincere, empathic, rapport-maintaining" sort of style pattern was reported by Bowers, Davis, and Bowers (1962), Hodgson and Horst (1959), Medley (1962), Medley and Mitzel (1959), , Ryans (1960a), and Wallen and others (1963) as well as by other investigators during recent years. In the reviewer's opinion, these should be considered primarily as underlying characteristics, or source traits, rather than teacher behaviors.…”
Section: Internal Inputs Contributing To Instructor Behaviormentioning
confidence: 75%
“…In the reviewer's opinion, these should be considered primarily as underlying characteristics, or source traits, rather than teacher behaviors. A pattern of styles involving "stimulating, imaginative, achievement-motivating, active, resourceful, dynamic" teacher characteristics was reported by Cotsonas and Kaiser (1962), Hodgson andHorst (1959), Medley (1962), Ryans (1960a), and Wallen and others (1963). Although the behaving styles reported covered a wide range, certain styles appeared to have been observed with some regularity by different researchers.…”
Section: Internal Inputs Contributing To Instructor Behaviormentioning
confidence: 79%
See 1 more Smart Citation